CLASS RELATIONS AND THE LAW: A MODEL AND AGENDA FOR RESEARCH.

The article focuses on the interplay between class relations and law, particularly how legal frameworks shape and reinforce economic inequalities and class divisions in contemporary society. It critiques the under-theorization of "class" within legal scholarship and proposes a model that defines cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law & Contemporary Problems Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 61 - 79
Main Author: ROGERS, BRISHEN
Format: Article
Published: Duke University 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189049277&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 189049277
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239186
        LCP
      jtl: Law & Contemporary Problems
      issn: 00239186
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2025
      vid: 88
      iid: 1
      pid: 588
      pub: Duke University
    artinfo:
      ui: 189049277
      ppf: 61
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: CLASS RELATIONS AND THE LAW: A MODEL AND AGENDA FOR RESEARCH.
      aug:
        au: ROGERS, BRISHEN
        affil: Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
      su:
        Wealth inequality
        Collective action
        Power (Social sciences)
        Equality
        Jurisprudence
        Socioeconomic factors
        American law
      sug:
        subj:
          Wealth inequality
          Collective action
          Power (Social sciences)
          Equality
          Jurisprudence
          Socioeconomic factors
          American law
      ab: The article focuses on the interplay between class relations and law, particularly how legal frameworks shape and reinforce economic inequalities and class divisions in contemporary society. It critiques the under-theorization of "class" within legal scholarship and proposes a model that defines class as a collective and antagonistic relationship around essential material resources, rather than merely an individual economic status. The author examines how law allocates rights of collective action differently across class groups—capital, upper-middle-class professionals, and the working class—highlighting the structural advantages that capital enjoys in enforcing its interests, while also addressing the challenges faced by workers in organizing and asserting their rights. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for a critical legal theory of class that encompasses various dimensions of social subordination, including race and gender, and acknowledges the historical evolution of class relations within legal contexts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N