Reconsidering Schlick's Critique of Husserl.
The controversy between Edmund Husserl and Moritz Schlick played a significant role in forging divisions between the phenomenological tradition and analytic philosophy. While Schlick systematically criticised multiple facets of Husserl's outlook from 1910 onwards, Husserl's brief response in the 192...
| Published in: | Husserl Studies Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 303 - 331 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Dec2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=189252412&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 189252412 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01679848 OG6 jtl: Husserl Studies issn: 01679848 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2025 vid: 41 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 189252412 10.1007/s10743-025-09364-4 ppf: 303 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Reconsidering Schlick's Critique of Husserl. aug: au: Vrahimis, Andreas affil: https://ror.org/02qjrjx09 Department of Classics and Philosophy, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus https://ror.org/01hcx6992 Department of Philosophy, HU Berlin, Berlin, Germany su: Phenomenology Analytic philosophy Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 Criticism Theory (Philosophy) Intuition Philosophers sug: subj: Phenomenology Analytic philosophy Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 Criticism Theory (Philosophy) Intuition Philosophers keyword: Logical Empiricism Psychologism Theories of truth ab: The controversy between Edmund Husserl and Moritz Schlick played a significant role in forging divisions between the phenomenological tradition and analytic philosophy. While Schlick systematically criticised multiple facets of Husserl's outlook from 1910 onwards, Husserl's brief response in the 1921 foreword to his Logische Untersuchungen was highly polemical. Given that he does not address Schlick's criticisms in detail, scholarship has hitherto focussed primarily on defending Husserl's position. In many such cases, Schlick's position has been misconstrued, primarily because his earliest and most detailed response to Husserl has not been taken into account. This paper reconstructs Schlick's overall argumentative strategy from his entry into the Psychologismusstreit in 1910, up to his response to Husserl in the second edition of Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre in 1925. Schlick's critique of Husserl begins with his early onslaught against the 'independence theory' of truth, which is then gradually connected to his overall critique of intuition. Any defence of Husserl from Schlick's objections is best undertaken in light of this overall argumentative strategy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Husserl Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved. item: Husserl Studies holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|