Response to One Interval Does Not Fit All: A Comment on "Optimizing Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in Athletic Tasks: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis for Prescription Variables and Research Methods"...Lima L, Fontanetti G. One interval does not fit all: A comment on “Optimizing post-activation performance enhancement in athletic tasks: a systematic review with meta-analysis for prescription variables and research methods”. Sport Med. 2025;55(12):3201-3202.
The letter discusses insights from a commentary on a recent meta-analysis regarding post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) research. It emphasizes the need for adapting recovery intervals between tests based on specific test characteristics, agreeing with the commentary's suggestion that sho...
| Publicado en: | Sports Medicine Vol. 55; no. 12; pp. 3203 - 3206 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | letter response Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=189360784&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 189360784 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01121642 C5H jtl: Sports Medicine issn: 01121642 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2025 vid: 55 iid: 12 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 189360784 187187365 187886930 189360784 189360784 10.1007/s40279-025-02295-2 189360784 ppf: 3203 ppct: 3 formats: tig: atl: Response to One Interval Does Not Fit All: A Comment on "Optimizing Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in Athletic Tasks: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis for Prescription Variables and Research Methods"...Lima L, Fontanetti G. One interval does not fit all: A comment on “Optimizing post-activation performance enhancement in athletic tasks: a systematic review with meta-analysis for prescription variables and research methods”. Sport Med. 2025;55(12):3201-3202. aug: au: Xu, Kai Blazevich, Anthony J. Boullosa, Daniel Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Yin, MingYue Zhong, YuMing Tian, YuHang Finlay, Mitchell Byrne, Paul J. Cuenca-Fernández, Francisco Wang, Ran affil: https://ror.org/0056pyw12 School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, No. 200, Henren Road, 200438, Shanghai, China sug: subj: Athletic Performance Evaluation Task Performance and Analysis Physical Fitness Evaluation Research Methodology Evaluation Athletic Training Methods Warm-Up Exercise Postactivation Potentiation Treatment Outcomes Recovery ab: The letter discusses insights from a commentary on a recent meta-analysis regarding post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) research. It emphasizes the need for adapting recovery intervals between tests based on specific test characteristics, agreeing with the commentary's suggestion that shorter intervals may be sufficient for certain tests, while longer recovery times are necessary for maximal intensity tests. The authors also highlight the importance of individualized recovery periods, noting that subjective feedback from athletes may not reliably indicate optimal recovery status. They call for further research to explore the stability of individualized responses over time and the influence of physiological differences on recovery and performance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: letter response Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|