Responsibility Gaps, LLMs & Organisations: Many Agents, Many Levels, and Many Interactions.

In this article, we propose a business ethics-inspired approach to address the distribution dimension of responsibility gaps introduced by general-purpose AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs). We argue that the pervasive deployment of LLMs exacerbates the long-standing problem of “ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1 - 25
Main Authors: Constantinescu, Mihaela, Kaptein, Muel
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=189377350&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 189377350
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 31
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189377350
        10.1007/s11948-025-00560-1
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Responsibility Gaps, LLMs & Organisations: Many Agents, Many Levels, and Many Interactions.
      aug:
        au:
          Constantinescu, Mihaela
          Kaptein, Muel
        affil:
          https://ror.org/02x2v6p15 Research Center in Applied Ethics (CCEA), Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
          https://ror.org/057w15z03 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
      su:
        Responsibility
        Language models
        Social responsibility of business
        Business ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Responsibility
          Language models
          Social responsibility of business
          Business ethics
      keyword:
        General-purpose AI models
        Large language models
        Many hands problem
        Moral responsibility
        Responsibility gaps
      ab: In this article, we propose a business ethics-inspired approach to address the distribution dimension of responsibility gaps introduced by general-purpose AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs). We argue that the pervasive deployment of LLMs exacerbates the long-standing problem of “many hands” in business ethics, which concerns the challenge of allocating moral responsibility for collective outcomes. In response to this issue, we introduce the “many-agents-many-levels-many-interactions” approach, labelled M3, which addresses responsibility gaps in LLM deployment by considering the complex web of interactions among diverse types of agents operating across multiple levels of action. The M3 approach demonstrates that responsibility distribution is not merely a function of agents’ roles or causal proximity, but primarily of the range and depth of their interactions. Contrary to reductionist views that suggest such complexity inevitably diffuses responsibility to the point of its disappearance, we argue that these interactions provide normative grounds for safeguarding the attribution of responsibility to agents. Central to the M3 approach is identifying agents who serve as nodes of interaction and therefore emerge as key loci of responsibility due to their capacity to influence others across different levels. We position LLM-developing organisations as an example of such agents. As nodes of interactions, LLM-developing organisations exert substantial influence over other agents and should be attributed broader responsibility for harmful outcomes of LLMs. The M3 approach thus offers a normative and practical tool for bridging potential gaps in the distribution of responsibility for LLM deployment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N