Exploring Research-Participant Perceptions of Experience Sampling Studies on Self-Harm.

Experience sampling research is making important contributions to our knowledge base on self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, there are unresolved questions about how people with SITB histories respond to participating in these studies, which can be demanding, relative to other res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Assessment Vol. 37; no. 11; pp. 571 - 585
Autores principales: Morgan, Reed M., Ilagan, Gabrielle S., Conway, Christopher C., Soroko, Emilia
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Nov2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189417838&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 189417838
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10403590
        POL
      jtl: Psychological Assessment
      issn: 10403590
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      vid: 37
      iid: 11
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189417838
        10.1037/pas0001382
      ppf: 571
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Exploring Research-Participant Perceptions of Experience Sampling Studies on Self-Harm.
      aug:
        au:
          Morgan, Reed M.
          Ilagan, Gabrielle S.
          Conway, Christopher C.
          Soroko, Emilia
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, Fordham University
          Department of Health Psychology and Clinical Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University
      su:
        New York (State)
        Self-injurious behavior
        Health literacy
        Human research subjects
        Participant-researcher relationships
        White people
        Self-mutilation
        Psychological stress
        Psychological tests
        Patients' attitudes
        Patient participation
        Emotion regulation
        Independent living
        T-test (Statistics)
        Descriptive statistics
        Thematic analysis
        Research methodology
        Data analysis software
      sug:
        subj:
          Self-injurious behavior
          Health literacy
          Human research subjects
          Participant-researcher relationships
          White people
          Self-mutilation
          Psychological stress
          Psychological tests
          Patients' attitudes
          Patient participation
          New York (State)
          Emotion regulation
          Independent living
          T-test (Statistics)
          Descriptive statistics
          Thematic analysis
          Research methodology
          Data analysis software
      keyword:
        ecological momentary assessment
        experience sampling methods
        self-injurious thoughts and behaviors
        suicide
        thematic analysis
        ecological momentary assessment
        experience sampling methods
        self-injurious thoughts and behaviors
        suicide
        thematic analysis
      ab: Experience sampling research is making important contributions to our knowledge base on self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, there are unresolved questions about how people with SITB histories respond to participating in these studies, which can be demanding, relative to other research designs. The present study explored how people engage with experience sampling methods (ESMs) that target SITB outcomes. Combining data from two studies of community-dwelling adults with a history of significant SITBs, we performed a mixed methods investigation of people's reactions to ESMs in a sample of 109 people (57.8% female; 26.6% trans/gender-expansive; 33.0% heterosexual; 53.2% White; 16.5% Latinx) who described (via closed- and open-ended questions) their perceptions of the research process. Our quantitative analyses replicated prior work in finding that most people rated the study experience as satisfactory, feasible, and not unduly stressful. Also, there was little evidence of iatrogenic effects (i.e., intensifying SITBs across the repeated assessments). Our qualitative investigation, based in reflexive thematic analysis, yielded themes related to self-awareness, confronting previously guarded internal experiences, emotion regulation, biographical or "self"-related change, and inconvenience. Guided by these results, we discuss potential benefits and harms of ESM study participation that we believe should be considered by researchers to promote ethical research practices and a more valid evidence base in the SITB literature. Public Significance Statement: We asked people with histories of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors to tell us what it is like to participate in research that involves completing multiple surveys per day on self-injury outcomes. Our analysis of their qualitative and quantitative responses suggests that study participation is generally enlightening and is only occasionally perceived as unduly inconvenient or emotionally triggering.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N