Indirect restrictions demobilize supporters of abortion rights.
State governments have created a multitude of indirect restrictions on abortion in the decades since Roe v. Wade. Here we test whether indirect restrictions demobilize abortion supporters relative to direct restrictions. We draw on research from moral psychology showing that people judge indirect of...
| Publicado en: | Policy Studies Journal Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 1123 - 1138 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189526199&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 189526199 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0190292X PSJ jtl: Policy Studies Journal issn: 0190292X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2025 vid: 53 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 189526199 10.1111/psj.12575 ppf: 1123 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 856KB tig: atl: Indirect restrictions demobilize supporters of abortion rights. aug: au: Connors, Elizabeth C. Del Ponte, Alessandro DeScioli, Peter affil: Department of Political Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia South Carolina,, USA Department of Political Science, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Alabama,, USA Global Asia Institute, National University of Singapore,, Singapore Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook New York,, USA su: Reproductive rights Pro-choice movement Policy sciences Political participation Moral reasoning Roe v. Wade sug: subj: Reproductive rights Pro-choice movement Policy sciences Political participation Moral reasoning Roe v. Wade keyword: abortion abortion bans experimental political science indirect policies moral psychology aborto ciencia política experimental políticas indirectas prohibición del aborto psicología moral 堕胎 堕胎禁令 实验政治学 道德心理学 间接政策 abortion abortion bans experimental political science indirect policies moral psychology aborto ciencia política experimental políticas indirectas prohibición del aborto psicología moral 堕胎 堕胎禁令 实验政治学 道德心理学 间接政策 ab: State governments have created a multitude of indirect restrictions on abortion in the decades since Roe v. Wade. Here we test whether indirect restrictions demobilize abortion supporters relative to direct restrictions. We draw on research from moral psychology showing that people judge indirect offenses as less morally wrong than direct offenses, holding constant the consequences of the offenses. In two experiments, pro‐choice participants answered how much they oppose a banning policy (a direct restriction), a defunding policy (an indirect restriction), or an excluding policy (the same as defunding but framed as more direct). In both experiments, pro‐choice participants were less opposed to defunding than banning or excluding, even when the number of women affected was held constant. These results support the hypothesis that indirect restrictions can demobilize political opponents. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|