Latent profile analysis of rumination subtypes and associations with suicidal ideation and behavior.

AbstractThis study examined profiles of rumination and their associations with suicidal ideation and behavior. Two hundred fourteen adults (≥18 years) completed an online survey between July 2024 and March 2025. Latent profile analysis used four rumination subtypes. Five profiles emerged: <italic>lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Death Studies pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Ha, Hyeju, Shim, Eun-Jung
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=189631360&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 189631360
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07481187
        DEA
      jtl: Death Studies
      issn: 07481187
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189631360
        10.1080/07481187.2025.2591318
        189631360
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Latent profile analysis of rumination subtypes and associations with suicidal ideation and behavior.
      aug:
        au:
          Ha, Hyeju
          Shim, Eun-Jung
        affil: Department of Psychology, Pusan National University
      sug:
      ab: AbstractThis study examined profiles of rumination and their associations with suicidal ideation and behavior. Two hundred fourteen adults (≥18 years) completed an online survey between July 2024 and March 2025. Latent profile analysis used four rumination subtypes. Five profiles emerged: <italic>low</italic> (20.1%), <italic>moderate reflection–deliberate</italic> (30.4%), <italic>moderate brooding</italic>–<italic>intrusive</italic> (21.0%), <italic>high reflection–deliberate</italic> (11.2%), and <italic>high brooding–intrusive</italic> (17.3%). Compared with the low rumination class, depression was higher in the <italic>moderate and high brooding–intrusive</italic> classes (ORs = 1.95–2.10), anxiety was elevated across all higher-rumination classes (ORs = 1.61–2.33), and attentional control was lower in the <italic>moderate and high brooding–intrusive rumination</italic> classes (ORs <italic>=</italic> 0.82). Moderate and high classes also showed greater suicidal ideation, intensity, and risk. Both brooding–intrusive and reflection–deliberate rumination were associated with increased suicide risk, underscoring the need to address diverse rumination styles in suicide prevention.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N