Capital as 'Bad Infinity': On the Hegelian Ancestry of a Key Marxian Theme.

Hegel's Marxian critics have traditionally rejected his characterization of the modern economy as a "system of needs", fuelled by the self‐interested interactions of particular market agents. This characterization is flawed, so the argument goes, for it fails to identify the true motivation behind t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 1450 - 1466
Main Author: Ferro, Bernardo
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=189713160&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 189713160
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 33
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189713160
        10.1111/ejop.13078
      ppf: 1450
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Capital as 'Bad Infinity': On the Hegelian Ancestry of a Key Marxian Theme.
      aug:
        au: Ferro, Bernardo
        affil: Institute for Philosophical Studies, University of Coimbra
      su:
        Marxist philosophy
        Hegelianism
        Capitalism
        Desire
        Need (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Marxist philosophy
          Hegelianism
          Capitalism
          Desire
          Need (Philosophy)
      ab: Hegel's Marxian critics have traditionally rejected his characterization of the modern economy as a "system of needs", fuelled by the self‐interested interactions of particular market agents. This characterization is flawed, so the argument goes, for it fails to identify the true motivation behind the production and exchange of value under capitalism. Challenging this line of criticism, I argue that Hegel does not see the capitalist economic system as a mere addition to a pre‐existing substrate of individual needs and desires. On the contrary, he argues that the capitalist drive towards infinite growth tends to subvert the traditional relationship between human needs and the means employed to satisfy them, so that the former become mere vehicles for the self‐reproduction of the latter. And this subversion anticipates the drive for self‐valorization that lies at the core of the Marxian notion of capital.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N