Desk review as a methodological approach for identifying policies and gray literature: A case study.

Desk reviews are widely used in health policy research, yet standardized procedures are lacking. This becomes particularly problematic when working with regulatory and professional documents that are not indexed in academic databases, making access and analysis fragmented. The paper aims to propose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nursing Outlook Vol. 73; no. 6
Autores principales: Barbieri, Martina, Catania, Gianluca, Hayter, Mark, ALEO, Giuseppe, Zanini, Milko, Sasso, Loredana, Bagnasco, Annamaria
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Nov2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=189854344&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 189854344
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00296554
        22Y
      jtl: Nursing Outlook
      issn: 00296554
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      vid: 73
      iid: 6
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189854344
        10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102547
        189854344
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Desk review as a methodological approach for identifying policies and gray literature: A case study.
      aug:
        au:
          Barbieri, Martina
          Catania, Gianluca
          Hayter, Mark
          ALEO, Giuseppe
          Zanini, Milko
          Sasso, Loredana
          Bagnasco, Annamaria
        affil: Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Edit and Review Methods
          Research Methodology
          Data Collection Methods
          Health Policy
          Gray Literature
          Information Storage
          Information Seeking Behavior
          Publishing
          Information Resources
          Italy
          Midwifery Service
          International Confederation of Midwives
          Conceptual Framework
          Practice Guidelines
          Research, Nursing
          Research, Midwifery
      ab: Desk reviews are widely used in health policy research, yet standardized procedures are lacking. This becomes particularly problematic when working with regulatory and professional documents that are not indexed in academic databases, making access and analysis fragmented. The paper aims to propose a structured approach to conducting a desk review. A case study is presented. Drawing on a three-step method—comprising an initial broad search, a targeted exploration of institutional sources, and an iterative selection and refinement process—the study offers a replicable framework to ensure rigor, transparency, and adaptability. The approach is illustrated through its application to the regulatory landscape of midwifery care in Italy, using the International Confederation of Midwives' Professional Framework as a reference for thematic analysis. By outlining the methodology in detail, the paper contributes to strengthening desk review practices in health policy research and offers practical guidance for researchers working with gray literature and fragmented policy sources. • A structured three-step method for desk reviews of policy documents is proposed. • The method ensures rigor and transparency in analyzing nonindexed sources. • The approach is adaptable to various health policy and professional contexts. • Supports methodological clarity in policy research for nursing and midwifery.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N