Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong.

Weyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 76; no. 4; pp. 823 - 846
Autor principal: Chen, Lu
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Dec2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=189879615&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 189879615
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00070882
        BPL
      jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00070882
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 76
      iid: 4
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189879615
        10.1086/722106
      ppf: 823
      ppct: 23
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong.
      aug:
        au: Chen, Lu
        affil: Philosophy Department. Koc University. İstanbul, Türkiye.
      su:
        Discrete geometry
        Euclidean geometry
        Geometry
        Statistical physics
        Quantum mechanics
      sug:
        subj:
          Discrete geometry
          Euclidean geometry
          Geometry
          Statistical physics
          Quantum mechanics
      ab: Weyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an importantly flawed assumption in Weyl's argument: physical geometry is determined by fundamental spacetime structures independently from dynamical laws. In this article, I aim to show its falsity through two rigorous examples: random walks in statistical physics and quantum mechanics.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N