Bilingual irony processing during natural reading: A within-participant look at L1 versus L2 effects using eye-movement measures.

Ironic utterances (i.e., when people intend the opposite of what they say) are often more difficult to understand than literal utterances during natural reading (reviewed in Olkoniemi & Kaakinen, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 99-106, 2021). Moreover, ironic compliments ("Good job!...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 53; no. 8; pp. 2493 - 2509
Autores principales: Hodgins, Vegas, Tiv, Mehrgol, El Mouslih, Chaimaa, Tarín, Karla, Mansuri, Naima, Iniesta, Antonio, Titone, Debra
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189934409&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 189934409
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189934409
        10.3758/s13421-025-01722-z
      ppf: 2493
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1012KB
      tig:
        atl: Bilingual irony processing during natural reading: A within-participant look at L1 versus L2 effects using eye-movement measures.
      aug:
        au:
          Hodgins, Vegas
          Tiv, Mehrgol
          El Mouslih, Chaimaa
          Tarín, Karla
          Mansuri, Naima
          Iniesta, Antonio
          Titone, Debra
        affil:
          https://ror.org/01pxwe438 Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001, McGill College, H3 A HG1, Montréal, Québec, Canada
          https://ror.org/01qn7cs15 US Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA
      su:
        Canada
        Reading
        Multilingualism
        Psycholinguistics
        Figures of speech
        Research funding
        Phonological awareness
        Descriptive statistics
        Experimental design
        Reaction time
        Data analysis software
        Eye movements
      sug:
        subj:
          Reading
          Multilingualism
          Psycholinguistics
          Figures of speech
          Canada
          Research funding
          Phonological awareness
          Descriptive statistics
          Experimental design
          Reaction time
          Data analysis software
          Eye movements
      keyword:
        Bilingualism
        Individual differences
        Irony
        Pragmatics
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology Cognitive Sciences
        Bilingualism
        Individual differences
        Irony
        Pragmatics
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology Cognitive Sciences
      ab: Ironic utterances (i.e., when people intend the opposite of what they say) are often more difficult to understand than literal utterances during natural reading (reviewed in Olkoniemi & Kaakinen, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 99-106, 2021). Moreover, ironic compliments ("Good job!" spoken upon a failure) tend to be even more challenging compared to ironic criticisms ("Terrible job!" spoken upon a success) (Pexman & Olineck, Discourse Processes, 33, 199-217, 2002). Relevant here, understanding irony is thought to require mentalizing capacity, which may be impacted by bilingual language experience (Tiv et al., Memory & Cognition, 51, 253-272, 2023) and differ for first and second language reading (L1 and L2, respectively). In this study, bilingual adults read sentences containing ironic compliments, criticisms, and matched literal statements in both their L1 and their L2 (blocked and counterbalanced), enabling a rigorous within-participant evaluation of L1 versus L2 irony processing. Linear mixed-effects modelling demonstrated the increased difficulty of ironic compliments during reading but indicated no group-level, within-participant L1 versus L2 irony differences. However, a significant effect of bilingual language experience emerged, in that individual differences in how readers distribute use of their L1 and L2 (i.e., language entropy) patterned with faster go-past times for ironic sentences during L1 reading. These findings cohere with the idea that bilingual language experience may relate to mentalizing processes that underlie irony resolution (e.g., Tiv et al., Memory & Cognition, 51, 253-272, 2023).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N