Working memory updating for free items and for item-to-context bindings: When attention is enough and when gating is needed.

A well-supported working memory (WM) model holds that a "gate" separates the content of WM from information that does not need to be maintained or manipulated. Previous research suggests that switching between opening and closing this gate incurs a response-time cost, reflecting controlled cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 53; no. 8; pp. 2621 - 2635
Autores principales: Kessler, Yoav, Verschooren, Sam
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189934415&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 189934415
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189934415
        10.3758/s13421-025-01728-7
      ppf: 2621
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Working memory updating for free items and for item-to-context bindings: When attention is enough and when gating is needed.
      aug:
        au:
          Kessler, Yoav
          Verschooren, Sam
        affil:
          https://ror.org/05tkyf982 Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
          https://ror.org/00cv9y106 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
          https://ror.org/00py81415 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
      su:
        Debate
        Cost effectiveness
        Undergraduates
        Attention
        Paradigms (Social sciences)
        Memory
        Analysis of variance
        College students
        Cognition
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
        Experimental design
        Research
        Conceptual structures
        Medical coding
        Automation
        Data analysis software
      sug:
        subj:
          Debate
          Cost effectiveness
          Undergraduates
          Attention
          Paradigms (Social sciences)
          Memory
          Analysis of variance
          College students
          Cognition
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
          Experimental design
          Research
          Conceptual structures
          Medical coding
          Automation
          Data analysis software
      keyword:
        Gating
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Updating
        Working memory
        Gating
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Updating
        Working memory
      ab: A well-supported working memory (WM) model holds that a "gate" separates the content of WM from information that does not need to be maintained or manipulated. Previous research suggests that switching between opening and closing this gate incurs a response-time cost, reflecting controlled cognitive effort. However, the exact nature of this cost remains debated. Some studies find that closing the gate is more costly than opening it, while in other studies these costs are comparable. Using an intertrial interval manipulation in the reference-back paradigm, we show that the larger cost of gate-closing is not an intrinsic feature of WM control, but is instead influenced by the automatic retention and removal of stimulus- and response-related information in WM. This finding indicates that WM is automatically but transiently updated with information for which attention-consuming processes such as response selection take place, challenging the prevailing view that WM updating is always effortful and controlled. Crucially, our findings reveal that updating individual items occurs rapidly and automatically when a single item is maintained. In contrast, updating bindings between items and their context is a slower, effortful process that requires gating. These results reconcile conflicting views regarding the nature of working memory encoding and updating.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N