Non‐Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes (NERA‐PVC): Safety, Efficacy and Outcome.

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a well‐established treatment for patients high PVCs burden, even when arising from epicardial/intramural localization. Consistent data about safety of using high power RF is lacking in the literature in these regio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 36; no. 12; pp. 3126 - 3136
Main Authors: Falzone, Pasquale Valerio, Vazquez‐Calvo, Sara, Guichard, Jean Baptiste, Althoff, Till, Garre, Paz, Tolosana, Jose Maria, Guasch, Eduard, Borras, Roger, Mont, Lluis, Porta‐Sanchez, Andreu, Roca‐Luque, Ivo
Format: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=190212323&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 190212323
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 36
      iid: 12
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190212323
        185618278
        190212323
        190212323
        10.1111/jce.16716
        190212323
      ppf: 3126
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Non‐Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes (NERA‐PVC): Safety, Efficacy and Outcome.
      aug:
        au:
          Falzone, Pasquale Valerio
          Vazquez‐Calvo, Sara
          Guichard, Jean Baptiste
          Althoff, Till
          Garre, Paz
          Tolosana, Jose Maria
          Guasch, Eduard
          Borras, Roger
          Mont, Lluis
          Porta‐Sanchez, Andreu
          Roca‐Luque, Ivo
        affil: Institut Clinic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona Catalonia,, Spain
      sug:
        subj:
          Ablation Techniques Methods
          Radiofrequency Ablation Methods
          Arrhythmia, Ventricular Therapy
          Patient Safety Evaluation
          Coronary Vessels Radiation Effects
          Sinus of Valsalva Radiation Effects
          Heart Valves Radiation Effects
          Pulmonary Valve Radiation Effects
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Funding Source
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Hospitals
          Spain
          Descriptive Statistics
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Prospective Studies
          Coronary Angiography
          Chi Square Test
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Kaplan-Meier Estimator
          Cox Proportional Hazards Model
          Univariate Statistics
          Multivariate Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a well‐established treatment for patients high PVCs burden, even when arising from epicardial/intramural localization. Consistent data about safety of using high power RF is lacking in the literature in these regions. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of different RF power settings, efficacy and outcome of non‐endocardial PVCs ablation. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent PVC ablation were included (2017–2023). We defined "Non‐Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation"(NERA) a procedure in which at least one ablation site has been identified into the CVS, aortic cusps, inter‐leaflet region or pulmonary cusps. Results: Total number of NERA sites was 64 in 56 procedures. In 63% of the procedures, high power (≥ 40 W) and in 60% long duration (≥ 60 s) RF was delivered in at least one site (median power: 40 W(30–40), median duration of single RF 54 s(45–91). In 21% of the procedures, a combination of both high power and long duration RF applications was performed. Overall procedural success was achieved in 46 procedures 82%), complete in 39 (70%), partial in 7 (12%). Only one severe complication (pericardial bleeding) was observed. Multisite ablation was associated with procedural failure. During follow‐up, median PVC burden was 0.5%(0.5–9.5), with a median reduction of 97%. Multisite ablation and coronary venous system RF were predictors of recurrence (HR 3.6; p = 0.03) and HR 3.85; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Ablation from non‐endocardial sites is a safe and effective procedure, even using high power and/or long duration RF with clear benefit in terms of PVC burden reduction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N