How (Not) to Define Inertial Frames.

It is nearly impossible to open a textbook on Newtonian mechanics without encountering the concept of inertial frames: the frames that are privileged by the theory's dynamics. In this paper, I argue that extant definitions of inertial frames are unsatisfactory. I criticize two common definitions of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 103; no. 4; pp. 869 - 887
Autor principal: Jacobs, Caspar
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=190226488&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 190226488
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00048402
        BHK
      jtl: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 00048402
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 103
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190226488
        10.1080/00048402.2025.2481921
      ppf: 869
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: How (Not) to Define Inertial Frames.
      aug:
        au: Jacobs, Caspar
        affil: Leiden University
      su:
        Classical mechanics
        Spatiotemporal processes
        Communication
        Empirical research
        Symmetries (Quantum mechanics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Classical mechanics
          Spatiotemporal processes
          Communication
          Empirical research
          Symmetries (Quantum mechanics)
      keyword:
        classical mechanics
        empirical content
        inertial frames
        laws of nature
        spacetime structure
        symmetries
      ab: It is nearly impossible to open a textbook on Newtonian mechanics without encountering the concept of inertial frames: the frames that are privileged by the theory's dynamics. In this paper, I argue that extant definitions of inertial frames are unsatisfactory. I criticize two common definitions of inertial frames: law-based definitions, according to which inertial frames are simply those in which the laws are true, and structure-based definitions, according to which inertial frames are those that are 'adapted' to spatiotemporal structure. I then offer a new, symmetry-based definition of inertial frames. This definition offers a non-conventional way of specifying the dynamically privileged frames. The result clarifies the foundations of Newtonian mechanics and accounts for the empirical success of coordinate-dependent formulations of it.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Australasian Journal of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N