Digital Pathology Displays Under Pressure: Benchmarking Performance Across Market Grades.
Digital pathology (DP) has transformed the practice of pathology by digitizing pathology glass slides, thereby enhancing diagnostic capabilities. In contrast to radiology, studies comparing the efficiency of DP monitors are limited. This work used a stress test that simulated DP sign-out in practice...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 4090 - 4100 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=190236377&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 190236377 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 29482925 NR3A jtl: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine issn: 29482925 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2025 vid: 38 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 190236377 190236377 190236377 10.1007/s10278-025-01452-3 190236377 ppf: 4090 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Digital Pathology Displays Under Pressure: Benchmarking Performance Across Market Grades. aug: au: Marletta, Stefano Caputo, Alessandro Guidi, Gabriele Pantanowitz, Liron Pagni, Fabio Bavieri, Iacopo L'Imperio, Vincenzo Brunelli, Matteo Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo Eccher, Albino affil: Division of Pathology, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy sug: subj: Digital Imaging Pathology, Clinical Data Display Evaluation Computer Peripherals Evaluation Benchmarking Human Comparative Studies Consumer Satisfaction Descriptive Statistics Calibration Luminescent Measurements Color Image Processing, Computer Assisted Image Enhancement Quality Assurance T-Tests Simulations ab: Digital pathology (DP) has transformed the practice of pathology by digitizing pathology glass slides, thereby enhancing diagnostic capabilities. In contrast to radiology, studies comparing the efficiency of DP monitors are limited. This work used a stress test that simulated DP sign-out in practice to evaluate the performance of medical-grade (MG) and consumer off-the-shelf (COTS) displays. Four displays, including three MG and one COTS, were assessed for luminance, contrast ratio, accuracy, and image uniformity. Key metrics, such as luminance uniformity and maximum brightness, were evaluated during a 1-month period that simulated use to reflect an 8-h work day. MG displays outperformed COTS in critical parameters, even though consumer displays were satisfactory for diagnostic purposes. Image uniformity exhibited the most significant variations, with deterioration noted over 2.5% for all displays during the test period. This study compared different types of displays for DP and highlights the importance of regular calibration for maintaining display performance when using DP. Further research is recommended to define validation protocols, including the impact of display aging on DP accuracy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|