How Are Qualitative Methods Used in Implementation Science Research? Results From a Systematic Scoping Review.
| Publicado en: | Implementation Research & Practice Vol. 6; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
8/28/2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=190387441&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 190387441 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 26334895 MF7G jtl: Implementation Research & Practice issn: 26334895 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 8/28/2025 vid: 6 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 190387441 190387441 190387441 10.1177/26334895251367470 190387441 ppf: 1 ppct: 18 formats: tig: atl: How Are Qualitative Methods Used in Implementation Science Research? Results From a Systematic Scoping Review. aug: au: Hagaman, Ashley Rhodes, Elizabeth C. Aloe, Carlin F. Hennein, Rachel Peng, Mary L. Deyling, Maryann Georgescu, Michael Nyhan, Kate Schwartz, Anna Zhou, Kristal Katague, Marina Egger, Emilie Spiegelman, Donna affil: Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA sug: subj: Implementation Science Qualitative Studies Methods Research, Medical Program Implementation Human Scoping Review Funding Source Medline Embase Focus Groups Thematic Analysis Interview Guides Data Analysis Software Descriptive Statistics Interviews Grounded Theory Content Analysis United States pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article ab: language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|