Violation and the emancipatory subject: restorative justice and a tale of two absences.

In this paper I explore the philosophical grounds of critiques of restorative justice and their ethical limits by addressing two absences. George Pavlich's critical theory of restorative justice qua the 'imitor paradox' provides a unifying critical account that helpfully illuminates the ways in whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Critical Realism Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 383 - 403
Autor principal: Wilson, Amanda
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Aug2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=190585646&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 190585646
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14767430
        7DS
      jtl: Journal of Critical Realism
      issn: 14767430
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 24
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190585646
        10.1080/14767430.2025.2583047
      ppf: 383
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 410KB
      tig:
        atl: Violation and the emancipatory subject: restorative justice and a tale of two absences.
      aug:
        au: Wilson, Amanda
        affil: Law, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
      su:
        Restorative justice
        Critical theory
        Normativity (Ethics)
        Poststructuralism
        Worldview
        Liberty
        Ethical problems
      sug:
        subj:
          Restorative justice
          Critical theory
          Normativity (Ethics)
          Poststructuralism
          Worldview
          Liberty
          Ethical problems
      keyword:
        concrete universal/singular
        critical ethics
        emancipation
        imitor paradox
        violation
      ab: In this paper I explore the philosophical grounds of critiques of restorative justice and their ethical limits by addressing two absences. George Pavlich's critical theory of restorative justice qua the 'imitor paradox' provides a unifying critical account that helpfully illuminates the ways in which restorative justice has failed to give effect to its radical promise of emancipation from violation. However, I find that its poststructural/postmodern grounding means that the critique is unable to transcend itself. This is the first tale of absence I identify. The second emerges from its critical realist development. In absenting the absence of the 'imitor paradox', I draw on Roy Bhaskar's concrete universal/singular ethics, but find a further absence there in that it does not articulate the necessary ontological (moral, psychological, social) grounds for restorative justice ethics. A constellational development of the concrete universal/singular grounds the radical value of restorative justice beyond the imitor paradox.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Critical Realism is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Critical Realism
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N