Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination.

This article provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants—from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Gerontologist Vol. 65; no. 12; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Sefcik, Justine S, Boon, Jeffrey T, Buck, Harleah G, Frechman, Erica, Wallace, Cara L, Carpenter, Joan G
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Dec2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=190629535&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 190629535
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00169013
        GET
      jtl: Gerontologist
      issn: 00169013
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 65
      iid: 12
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190629535
        10.1093/geront/gnaf206
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination.
      aug:
        au:
          Sefcik, Justine S
          Boon, Jeffrey T
          Buck, Harleah G
          Frechman, Erica
          Wallace, Cara L
          Carpenter, Joan G
        affil:
          College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
          College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
          College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
          School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
          Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
          School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
      su:
        Diffusion of innovations
        Human research subjects
        Professional associations
        Deception
        Medical research
        Prevention of fraud in science
        Fraud prevention
        Data security
        Data security failures
        Experimental design
        Data quality
      sug:
        subj:
          Diffusion of innovations
          Human research subjects
          Professional associations
          Deception
          Medical research
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Labor Unions and Similar Labor Organizations
          Professional Organizations
          Other Computer Related Services
          Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)
          Prevention of fraud in science
          Fraud prevention
          Data security
          Data security failures
          Experimental design
          Data quality
      keyword:
        Participant deception
        Research fraud
        Research integrity recommendations
        Participant deception
        Research fraud
        Research integrity recommendations
      ab: This article provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants—from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This article serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N