Interrupting Innovation: Centring the Social.
The article critically reviews the book "Interrupting Innovation: Centring the Social," edited by Melanie Panitch, Samantha Wehbi, and Jessica Pimentel Machado, which focuses on social innovation through a specific program run by Toronto Metropolitan University. The review highlights a lack of empir...
| Publicado en: | Innovation Journal Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 1 - 5 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Innovation Journal
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=190658500&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 190658500 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17153816 6EWE jtl: Innovation Journal issn: 17153816 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 vid: 30 iid: 2 pid: 46463 pub: Innovation Journal artinfo: ui: 190658500 ppf: 1 ppct: 4 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.1MB tig: atl: Interrupting Innovation: Centring the Social. aug: au: Glor, Eleanor D. affil: Fellow, McLaughlin College, York University, Toronto, Canada su: Social innovation Empirical research Higher education Scholarly peer review Community arts projects Critical analysis sug: subj: Social innovation Empirical research Higher education Scholarly peer review Administration of General Economic Programs Community arts projects Critical analysis ab: The article critically reviews the book "Interrupting Innovation: Centring the Social," edited by Melanie Panitch, Samantha Wehbi, and Jessica Pimentel Machado, which focuses on social innovation through a specific program run by Toronto Metropolitan University. The review highlights a lack of empirical evidence supporting the book's claims of participant benefits and innovation, suggesting that the text reads more like a course material than a scholarly work. It notes that while the book discusses various projects involving art, it fails to adequately define social innovation or address the challenges faced in these initiatives. The reviewer expresses concern over the book's reliance on vague claims of success and its limited engagement with broader social innovation literature. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|