LA DIMENSIÓN DIALÓGICA EN LA REFUTACIÓN DE LA DONACIÓN DE CONSTANTINO DE LORENZO VALLA.

This article analyzes Lorenzo Valla's De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione based on its connections to the dialogue genre, which he cultivated in works such as De vero bono, De libero arbitrio, and De professione religiosorum. Although structured as a forensic oratio, the text incorpor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Talia Dixit no. 20; pp. 139 - 167
Autor principal: Vilar, Mariano
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Talia Dixit 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=190736715&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 190736715
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18869440
        78H8
      jtl: Talia Dixit
      issn: 18869440
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2025
      iid: 20
      pid: 47630
      pub: Talia Dixit
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190736715
        10.17398/1886-9440.20.139
      ppf: 139
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 3.4MB
      tig:
        atl: LA DIMENSIÓN DIALÓGICA EN LA REFUTACIÓN DE LA DONACIÓN DE CONSTANTINO DE LORENZO VALLA.
      aug:
        au: Vilar, Mariano
        affil: Universidad de Buenos Aires
      su:
        Philology
        Persuasion (Rhetoric)
        Historical source material
        Discourse
        Scholarly method
        Historical analysis
        Philosophers
        Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, d. 337
        Liberty of conscience
      sug:
        subj:
          Philology
          Persuasion (Rhetoric)
          Historical source material
          Discourse
          Scholarly method
          Historical analysis
          Philosophers
          Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, d. 337
          Liberty of conscience
      keyword:
        Donation of Constantine
        Renaissance dialogue
        diálogo renacentista
        Donación de Constantino
        Lorenzo Valla
      ab:
        This article analyzes Lorenzo Valla's De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione based on its connections to the dialogue genre, which he cultivated in works such as De vero bono, De libero arbitrio, and De professione religiosorum. Although structured as a forensic oratio, the text incorporates resources from the humanistic disputatio--prosopopoeia, apostrophe, enargeia, concessio--that turn it into a "dialogue in absentia" with historical and imaginary adversaries. The study shows how Valla constructs plausible scenes to highlight the implausibility of the Constitutum Constantini, personifies figures such as the forger "Palea" to expose their ignorance or hypocrisy, and employs concessio as a dialectical trap that reinforces his refutation. These strategies serve not only a stylistic function but also shape a "dialogical critique" in which philology becomes performative, revives the past, and strips texts and institutions of their authority. It is concluded that this work combines forensic rhetoric and dialogical dramatization to transform philological criticism into an act of intellectual emancipation, affirming the primacy of reason and evidence over all hierarchy.
        Este artículo analiza el De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione de Lorenzo Valla a partir de sus vínculos con el género dialógico que cultivó en obras como De vero bono, De libero arbitrio y De professione religiosorum. Aunque estructurado como una oratio forense, el texto incorpora recursos propios de la disputatio humanística --prosopopeya, apóstrofe, enargeia, concessio-- que lo convierten en un "diálogo in absentia" con adversarios históricos e imaginarios. El estudio muestra cómo Valla construye escenas verosímiles para resaltar la inverosimilitud del Constitutum Constantini, personifica figuras como el falsificador "Palea" para exhibir su ignorancia o hipocresía, y emplea la concessio como trampa dialéctica que refuerza la refutación. Estas estrategias no cumplen solo una función estilística, sino que configuran una "crítica dialógica" en la que la filología se vuelve performativa, revive el pasado y despoja de autoridad a textos e instituciones. Se concluye que esta obra combina retórica forense y dramatización dialógica para transformar la crítica filológica en un acto de emancipación intelectual, afirmando la primacía de la razón y de la evidencia frente a toda jerarquía.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Spanish
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Talia Dixit is the property of Talia Dixit and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Talia Dixit
      holder: Talia Dixit
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N