Quantitative headform fit evaluation and predictive modeling to assist with selecting N95 filtering facepiece respirators to mitigate respiratory hazards.

Ensuring that respiratory protection is effective for all can be difficult if limited resources are available to assist with selecting a well-fitting respirator model and user guidance. To better understand how various N95® filtering facepiece respirator models fit on a variety of face sizes, a quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 22; no. 12; pp. 959 - 970
Autores principales: Vollmer, Brooke, Bergman, Michael S., Boyles, Harold, Meyers, Jordan, Payne, Nora Y., Pollard, Jonisha, Zhuang, Ziqing
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=190769451&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 190769451
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 22
      iid: 12
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190769451
        187546049
        190769451
        190769451
        10.1080/15459624.2025.2540829
        190769451
      ppf: 959
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Quantitative headform fit evaluation and predictive modeling to assist with selecting N95 filtering facepiece respirators to mitigate respiratory hazards.
      aug:
        au:
          Vollmer, Brooke
          Bergman, Michael S.
          Boyles, Harold
          Meyers, Jordan
          Payne, Nora Y.
          Pollard, Jonisha
          Zhuang, Ziqing
        affil: National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
      sug:
        subj:
          Equipment Design Evaluation
          Respiratory Protective Devices Evaluation
          Occupational Exposure Prevention and Control
          N95 Respirators
          Respiratory Tract Diseases Prevention and Control
          Prediction Models
          Environmental Health
          Occupational Health
          Human
          United States
          Male
          Female
          Quantitative Studies
          Multiple Logistic Regression
          Occupational Safety
          Respiratory Protective Devices Standards
          Descriptive Statistics
          Anthropometry
          Confidence Intervals
          Male
          Female
      ab: Ensuring that respiratory protection is effective for all can be difficult if limited resources are available to assist with selecting a well-fitting respirator model and user guidance. To better understand how various N95® filtering facepiece respirator models fit on a variety of face sizes, a quantitative fit evaluation was performed on 12 different N95 respirators distributed by the Strategic National Stockpile using five manikin headform sizes representative of most of the U.S. worker population (540 total tests). Manikin fit factor results varied depending on the respirator model and headform combination. Four respirator models achieved passing fit results across all headform sizes. Predictive modeling was then initiated, where the headform most closely aligned to an individual's facial dimensions is determined and then used to identify N95 respirators that may provide an acceptable fit. A multinomial logistic regression model was trained and tested using NIOSH's 2003 Anthropometric U.S. Survey and was found to have an accuracy of 85%. To address potential risks associated with predicting only a single headform size, a modified model allowing for multiple headform size predictions was also assessed and found to have an improved accuracy rate of 98%. With further human subject validation and field testing, this modeling approach could be used as a tool to aid in making the fit testing process more efficient, less burdensome, and better enable individuals to use respirators that fit more effectively, thereby adequately protecting them from hazards.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N