Critical actions for embedding research evidence into practice: how to get the most out of your implementation scientist.

Implementation science has been gaining traction over the last decade to support health care systems in adopting and sustaining evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies. Given the inherent complexity of implementation research and practice, and their associated methodologies, implementat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JBI Evidence Implementation Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 223 - 232
Autores principales: Mazariego, Carolyn, Gul, Hossai, Liang, Shuang, Kelly-Hanku, Angela, Brady, Bernadette, Allida, Sabine, Baffsky, Rachel, McErlean, Gemma, Crespo, Carmen, Hodgins, Michael, Christie, Lauren, Peiris, David, Debono, Deborah, MacMillan, Freya, Ferguson, Caleb, Heneka, Nicole, Kennedy, Sarah G., Liu, Hueiming, Morrow, April, Fontaine, Guillaume
Formato: case study pictorial Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jan2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191017479&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191017479
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        26913321
        MO0F
      jtl: JBI Evidence Implementation
      issn: 26913321
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2026
      vid: 24
      iid: 1
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191017479
        191017479
        191017479
        10.1097/XEB.0000000000000518
        191017479
      ppf: 223
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Critical actions for embedding research evidence into practice: how to get the most out of your implementation scientist.
      aug:
        au:
          Mazariego, Carolyn
          Gul, Hossai
          Liang, Shuang
          Kelly-Hanku, Angela
          Brady, Bernadette
          Allida, Sabine
          Baffsky, Rachel
          McErlean, Gemma
          Crespo, Carmen
          Hodgins, Michael
          Christie, Lauren
          Peiris, David
          Debono, Deborah
          MacMillan, Freya
          Ferguson, Caleb
          Heneka, Nicole
          Kennedy, Sarah G.
          Liu, Hueiming
          Morrow, April
          Fontaine, Guillaume
        affil: School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Implementation Science
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Interprofessional Relations
          Diffusion of Innovation
          Research, Medical
          Organizational Change
          Team Building
          Quality Improvement
          Sustainable Growth
          Stakeholder Participation
          Translational Medical Research
          Program Development
          Collaboration
          Professional Competence
          Guideline Adherence
      ab: Implementation science has been gaining traction over the last decade to support health care systems in adopting and sustaining evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies. Given the inherent complexity of implementation research and practice, and their associated methodologies, implementation scientists play a central role in translating research into practice. However, many health care system stakeholders often struggle to understand how best to collaborate with implementation scientists. This commentary discusses the significant benefits of such collaboration, outlining ten critical actions drawn from the collective experience of 25 implementation scientists with over 173 years of combined expertise. This project was conducted under the SPHERE Implementation Science Platform, as part of the Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE). The ten recommendations for working with an implementation scientist to optimize implementation efforts include the following: (1) involve implementation scientists early during intervention design, (2) recognize the unique nature and value of implementation science data, (3) integrate implementation assessments into the research plan, (4) foster collaborative partnerships inclusive of implementation science, (5) differentiate between factors affecting implementation and wider constraints, (6) work with implementation scientists to address implementation challenges, (7) prioritize implementation scale and sustainment, (8) embrace that implementation requires continuous learning and adaptation, (9) promote knowledge exchange between implementation science and subject matter experts, and (10) focus on capability- and capacity-building for implementation within the system. By following these recommendations, researchers, clinicians, decision-makers, and implementation scientists can foster impactful collaborations that enhance the translation of research into clinical practice and improve the quality of health care delivery. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A374
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        pictorial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N