Building Community Capacity for Harm Reduction: An Adaptive Implementation Science Approach in Rural Appalachian Ohio.

Background: Rural communities face significant implementation challenges addressing the overdose epidemic, including limited treatment capacity, pervasive stigma toward people who use drugs, and social and political opposition to evidence-based interventions. Objectives: Rather than implementing pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Substance Use: Research & Treatment Vol. 20; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Sibley, Adams L., Schalkoff, Christine A., Colston, David C., Piscalko, Hannah M., Spears, Abby G., Miller, William C., Go, Vivian F.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 1/28/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191203603&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191203603
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        29768357
        NKBW
      jtl: Substance Use: Research & Treatment
      issn: 29768357
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1/28/2026
      vid: 20
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191203603
        191203603
        191203603
        10.1177/29768357251413412
        191203603
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Building Community Capacity for Harm Reduction: An Adaptive Implementation Science Approach in Rural Appalachian Ohio.
      aug:
        au:
          Sibley, Adams L.
          Schalkoff, Christine A.
          Colston, David C.
          Piscalko, Hannah M.
          Spears, Abby G.
          Miller, William C.
          Go, Vivian F.
        affil: Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Harm Reduction
          Implementation Science
          Rural Areas Ohio
          Appalachian Region
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Funding Source
          Ohio
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Rural communities face significant implementation challenges addressing the overdose epidemic, including limited treatment capacity, pervasive stigma toward people who use drugs, and social and political opposition to evidence-based interventions. Objectives: Rather than implementing prescribed harm reduction services that may face community resistance, the Ohio Opioid Project adopted a capacity-building approach to address structural barriers and enhance community readiness for future harm reduction and treatment innovation across 3 rural Appalachian Ohio counties. Methods: This applied implementation project used the Evidence-Making Intervention framework with process evaluation. Mixed-methods formative research included interviews with stakeholders (n = 34) and people who use drugs (n = 30), respondent-driven sampling surveys with people who use drugs (n = 258), organizational network analysis, and surveillance data review. A 9-member Community Leadership Board – including health commissioners, treatment providers, and harm reduction program representatives – co-developed interventions targeting 3 structural barriers: substance use-related stigma, interagency fragmentation, and inadequate provider capacity. Community members served as leadership board representatives, implementation staff, intervention consultants, and data collectors, democratizing research involvement and building local public health capacity. Implementation followed an adaptive approach, allowing activities to evolve based on emerging needs, policy changes, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The service delivery plan included 20+ activities across stigma reduction, interagency coordination, and provider capacity building. Key activities included peer recovery supporter training, law enforcement harm reduction seminars, faith-based stigma reduction forums, conflict resolution processes, establishment of drug court buprenorphine protocols, and HCV telehealth partnerships. Multiple activities were sustained by community partners beyond the research period, including resource clearinghouses, new regional partnerships, and organizational protocols integrating harm reduction into existing services. Conclusions: Capacity-building implementation science can address structural barriers to community-based harm reduction in resistant rural settings. By prioritizing community co-creation and adaptive implementation, this approach created foundational conditions for sustainable harm reduction innovation while respecting local contexts and readiness for change.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N