Development and Validation of a Nurse‐Specific Scale to Assess Influencing Factors in Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation: An i‐PARIHS‐Based Study.

Background: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) is essential for improving the quality and consistency of care. However, gaps between guideline recommendations and nursing practice remain, contributing to adverse patient outcomes. A theory‐based tool is needed to systematically assess factors that inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nursing Management Vol. 2026; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Liu, Lu, Dallakoti, Namuna, Cui, Wei, Li, Xiangyu, Ding, Shu, Zhang, Shan, Xu, Haibo
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 2/1/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191298118&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191298118
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09660429
        81U
      jtl: Journal of Nursing Management
      issn: 09660429
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2/1/2026
      vid: 2026
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191298118
        191298118
        191298118
        10.1155/jonm/4584848
        191298118
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Development and Validation of a Nurse‐Specific Scale to Assess Influencing Factors in Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation: An i‐PARIHS‐Based Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Liu, Lu
          Dallakoti, Namuna
          Cui, Wei
          Li, Xiangyu
          Ding, Shu
          Zhang, Shan
          Xu, Haibo
        affil: School of Nursing,, Capital Medical University,, Beijing, CN 100069,, China, ccmu.edu.cn
      sug:
        subj:
          Nurses Psychosocial Factors
          Scales
          Instrument Construction
          Instrument Validation
          Practice Guidelines
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Age Factors
          Delphi Technique
          Surveys
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Tertiary Health Care
          Funding Source
          Reproducibility of Results
          Psychometrics
          Factor Analysis
          Health Facility Administration
          Work Environment
          Implementation Science
          China
          Pilot Studies
          Exploratory Research
          Content Validity
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Coefficient alpha
          Internal Consistency
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Construct Validity
          Validation Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) is essential for improving the quality and consistency of care. However, gaps between guideline recommendations and nursing practice remain, contributing to adverse patient outcomes. A theory‐based tool is needed to systematically assess factors that influence nurses' implementation of CPG. Objective: To develop and validate the Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Influencing Factors for Nurses (CPGIF-N) scale for identifying factors affecting CPG implementation among nurses. Methods: Items were generated through a scoping review and refined via two‐round Delphi reviews. A pilot survey with 40 nurses and a cross‐sectional survey with 1005 nurses from eight tertiary hospitals were conducted. Both classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analyses were performed. Results: A total of 637 valid responses were analyzed. Content validity indices were high (I‐CVI: 0.93–1.00; S‐CVI/Ave: 0.99). The IRT analysis indicated that the final items demonstrated good discrimination (a = 1.278–4.579), ordered threshold parameters (b1 to b4), and acceptable to excellent average information (range: 0.700–2.161). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed acceptable‐fit indices (χ2/df = 1.956, RMSEA = 0.055, CFI = 0.935, TLI = 0.929). Average variance extracted values (0.818, 0.632, and 0.815) and composite reliability values (0.973, 0.941, and 0.982) confirmed convergent validity. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.972; McDonald's Omega = 0.982). Conclusions: The CPGIF-N scale is a reliable and valid instrument, with strong psychometric properties, offering a practical tool to evaluate factors influencing CPG implementation among nurses in China.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N