How Should Clinical Ethics Evolve to Ensure Moral Use of AI?
Artificial intelligence is reshaping clinical decision‐making in ways that challenge assumptions about patient‐centered care, moral responsibility, and professional judgment. Encoding Bioethics: AI in Clinical Decision‐Making, by Charles Binkley and Tyler Loftus, begins where ethical reflection on t...
| Publicado en: | Hastings Center Report Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 47 - 50 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=191353598&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 191353598 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00930334 HCR jtl: Hastings Center Report issn: 00930334 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2026 vid: 56 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 191353598 10.1002/hast.70016 ppf: 47 ppct: 3 formats: tig: atl: How Should Clinical Ethics Evolve to Ensure Moral Use of AI? aug: au: Lyons, Colleen P. su: Artificial intelligence Bioethics Medical ethics Decision making in clinical medicine sug: subj: Artificial intelligence Bioethics Medical ethics Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Decision making in clinical medicine keyword: algorithmic decision‐making artificial intelligence in health care bioethics clinical ethics implementation science algorithmic decision‐making artificial intelligence in health care bioethics clinical ethics implementation science ab: Artificial intelligence is reshaping clinical decision‐making in ways that challenge assumptions about patient‐centered care, moral responsibility, and professional judgment. Encoding Bioethics: AI in Clinical Decision‐Making, by Charles Binkley and Tyler Loftus, begins where ethical reflection on this topic should begin—in the trenches of clinical care. Together with the National Academy of Medicine's publication An Artificial Intelligence Code of Conduct for Health and Medicine: Essential Guidance for Aligned Action, which came out after the book, Encoding Bioethics goes a long way toward offering physicians, patients, developers, and health‐system leaders actionable guidance. Through explanation, probing questions, and case studies, Binkley and Loftus illuminate the ethical difficulties posed by opacity, bias, and shifting clinical roles. Yet their analysis stops short of identifying the governance tools and operational structures that are essential for achieving patient‐centered, morally responsible AI that strengthens clinical judgment. This review essay argues that bridging ethics and practice requires attention to psychological safety, organizational dynamics, and implementation science to ensure that AI supports—not supplants—ethical care. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|