Cover Image
QR Code

Quantum for Whom? Situating Ethical Risks in Quantum Technologies’ Innovation Context.

Although quantum technologies (QT) are still in their early stages of development, their ethical foundations are already being shaped by their innovation context. While earlier works have discussed the ethical implications of this emerging field, the contextualization of these risks in broader socio...

Full description

Published in:NanoEthics Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Main Author: Barea, María A.
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Apr2026
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=191417155&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 191417155
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18714757
        46ON
      jtl: NanoEthics
      issn: 18714757
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 20
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191417155
        10.1007/s11569-026-00496-1
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 631KB
      tig:
        atl: Quantum for Whom? Situating Ethical Risks in Quantum Technologies’ Innovation Context.
      aug:
        au: Barea, María A.
        affil: https://ror.org/02e2c7k09 Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
      sug:
      keyword:
        Ethics of Technologies
        Governance of emerging technologies
        Inequality
        Political economy of innovation
        Quantum Technologies
      ab: Although quantum technologies (QT) are still in their early stages of development, their ethical foundations are already being shaped by their innovation context. While earlier works have discussed the ethical implications of this emerging field, the contextualization of these risks in broader socio-technical dynamics has received less attention. Drawing on interdisciplinary sources, I present a critical interpretive literature review of QT’s ethical challenges, situating them within the technologies’ broader socio-technical context and showing how innovation dynamics and socio-political factors contribute to shaping their normative futures. While many of QT’s ethical challenges stem from anticipated technical affordances, these risks must also be understood through broader socio-technical dynamics, opening valuable lines of inquiry into who sets research priorities, whose interests are served, and what alternative futures are foreclosed. Through expanding our view of QT’s ethical challenges towards the structural conditions that inscribe, and sometimes intensify them, we gain a better understanding of the normative assumptions being embedded into the field, elucidating how these narrow the space for alternative forms of innovation. Insights suggest that, without critical reflection, the hegemonic innovation trajectory risks constraining democratic oversight and ethical reflection precisely at a foundational moment, when QT’s pathways are being locked in.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: NanoEthics is a copyright of Springer, 2026. All Rights Reserved.
      item: NanoEthics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2026
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N