The Effects of Electromagnetic Articulography Sensors on Speech in Individuals With and Without Parkinson's Disease.

Purpose: This study examined how wearing electromagnetic articulography (EMA) sensors affects acoustic and perceptual speech outcomes in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) with dysarthria and neurologically healthy control speakers. Additionally, the study explored potential after-effects on aco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 483 - 506
Autores principales: Thompson, Austin, Hirsch, Micah, Kim, Yunjung
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=191547597&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 191547597
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 69
      iid: 2
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191547597
        10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00263
      ppf: 483
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 5.3MB
      tig:
        atl: The Effects of Electromagnetic Articulography Sensors on Speech in Individuals With and Without Parkinson's Disease.
      aug:
        au:
          Thompson, Austin
          Hirsch, Micah
          Kim, Yunjung
        affil:
          Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, TX
          Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA
          School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee
      su:
        Florida
        Human beings
        Electromagnetism
        Dysarthria
        Research funding
        Wearable technology
        Verbal behavior testing
        Parkinson's disease
        Descriptive statistics
        Physiological aspects of speech
        Confidence intervals
        Articulation (Speech)
      sug:
        subj:
          Human beings
          Florida
          Electromagnetism
          Dysarthria
          Research funding
          Wearable technology
          Verbal behavior testing
          Parkinson's disease
          Descriptive statistics
          Physiological aspects of speech
          Confidence intervals
          Articulation (Speech)
      ab: Purpose: This study examined how wearing electromagnetic articulography (EMA) sensors affects acoustic and perceptual speech outcomes in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) with dysarthria and neurologically healthy control speakers. Additionally, the study explored potential after-effects on acoustic and perceptual measures following approximately 45 min of wearing EMA sensors in both groups. Finally, we investigated whether wearing EMA sensors or after-sensor effects differentially impacted the two groups. Method: Thirty-four speakers (21 controls and 13 PwPD) read "The Caterpillar" passage at three time points: (a) before sensors, (b) with sensors, and (c) after sensors. We analyzed changes in acoustic (articulation rate, articulatory--acoustic vowel space [AAVS], first and second spectral moment coefficients for fricatives) and perceptual (speech intelligibility, naturalness) measures across two key contrasts: sensor effects (With Sensors -- Before Sensors) and after-sensor effects (After Sensors -- Before Sensors). Results: Bayesian linear mixed-effects models showed sensor effects (With Sensors -- Before Sensors), with EMA sensors reducing intelligibility and naturalness and altering fricative spectral moments in both groups. Additionally, control speakers exhibited a faster articulation rate with sensors. Notably, PwPD were more negatively impacted by sensor effects in terms of intelligibility ratings. After-sensor effects (After Sensors -- Before Sensors) were also observed: Control speakers spoke faster following sensor removal, while PwPD demonstrated increased AAVS and were perceived as more natural. However, there was no compelling evidence that after-sensor effects differed between groups. Conclusions: EMA sensors primarily impact sibilant fricative production and perceptions of intelligibility and naturalness in PwPD and control speakers. PwPD experience greater sensor-related reductions in intelligibility, which should be carefully considered when using speech data collected with EMA to assess perceptual measures in clinical populations. Finally, PwPD exhibited increased naturalness and greater spectral distinctiveness following sensor removal, which we speculate may stem from increased passage familiarity and reduced cognitive demand. Supplemental Material and Open Science Form: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha. 31052272
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N