STRAW MAN FALLACY OF THE COMPLETE CONVERSATION SYSTEM CLAIM AGAINST THE TURING TEST.
This paper aims to present and discuss an argumentation against the Turing test (TT), which we shall call the CCSC (Complete Conversation System Claim). Exemplary arguments of the CCSC type include Lem's "Space Gramophone," the "machine equipped with a dictionary" proposed by Shannon and McCarthy, B...
| Published in: | Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy Vol. 22; no. 85; pp. 1 - 17 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
Dec2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=191557103&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 191557103 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17335566 77X1 jtl: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy issn: 17335566 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2025 vid: 22 iid: 85 pid: 49926 pub: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy artinfo: ui: 191557103 10.33392/diam.1856 ppf: 1 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.5MB tig: atl: STRAW MAN FALLACY OF THE COMPLETE CONVERSATION SYSTEM CLAIM AGAINST THE TURING TEST. aug: au: Łupkowski, Paweł affil: Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań su: Turing test Argument Lem, Stanislaw, 1921-2006 Searle, John R., 1932-2025 Artificial intelligence Communication models Logical fallacies Philosophy of mind sug: subj: Turing test Argument Lem, Stanislaw, 1921-2006 Searle, John R., 1932-2025 Artificial intelligence Communication models Logical fallacies Philosophy of mind keyword: argumentation conceptual foundations of AI intelligence logic of questions ab: This paper aims to present and discuss an argumentation against the Turing test (TT), which we shall call the CCSC (Complete Conversation System Claim). Exemplary arguments of the CCSC type include Lem's "Space Gramophone," the "machine equipped with a dictionary" proposed by Shannon and McCarthy, Block's "Aunt Bubbles," and Searle's "Chinese Room" argument. CCSC argumentation is constructed to show that the TT is not properly designed and, consequently, is not a good hallmark of intelligence. Based on the original TT rules reconstruction, I argue that CCSC-type argumentation seems to be aimed at a certain interpretation of the TT, which, as I demonstrate, commits the straw man fallacy. In light of the results presented by Łupkowski and Wiśniewski, I also discuss whether a complete conversation system is theoretically possible. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy is the property of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy holder: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|