Co‐Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.

Background: Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) are widely used as key indicators of value in healthcare towards improved services but are rarely applied among people with intellectual disability. Incorporating the experiences of people with intellectual disability in PREMs data is vital as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 1 - 12
Autores principales: Newman, Bronwyn, Wu, Ling, Mimmo, Laurel, Catlett, Beth, Van Hoeke, Matthew, Tokutake, Maya, Phillips, Karen, Van Hoeke, Deborah, Bowen, Kim, Baumgarter, Dalal Dawood, Patterson, Pandora, Manias, Elizabeth, Szanto, Tracey, Hackl, Nadine A., Basur, Dhruve, Li, Mingye, Adams, Corey, Olivier, Patrick, Strnadová, Iva, Trollor, Julian N.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191835405&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191835405
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 29
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191835405
        191835405
        191835405
        10.1111/hex.70562
        191835405
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Co‐Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.
      aug:
        au:
          Newman, Bronwyn
          Wu, Ling
          Mimmo, Laurel
          Catlett, Beth
          Van Hoeke, Matthew
          Tokutake, Maya
          Phillips, Karen
          Van Hoeke, Deborah
          Bowen, Kim
          Baumgarter, Dalal Dawood
          Patterson, Pandora
          Manias, Elizabeth
          Szanto, Tracey
          Hackl, Nadine A.
          Basur, Dhruve
          Li, Mingye
          Adams, Corey
          Olivier, Patrick
          Strnadová, Iva
          Trollor, Julian N.
        affil: Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Health Services Research
          Health Facilities Australia
          Patient Attitudes
          Support, Psychosocial
          Human
          Funding Source
          Australia
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Health Care Delivery
          Communication
          Hospitals Australia
          Seminars and Workshops
          Delphi Technique
          Pilot Studies
          Thematic Analysis
          Feedback
      ab: Background: Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) are widely used as key indicators of value in healthcare towards improved services but are rarely applied among people with intellectual disability. Incorporating the experiences of people with intellectual disability in PREMs data is vital as this group often encounter poor healthcare access and outcomes. This study reports the coproduction of accessible PREMs for people with intellectual disability from a 3‐year inclusive research project called Listen to Me. Objective: To coproduce a PREM suitable for people with intellectual disability. Method: Co‐production occurred through inclusive data collection methods in five hybrid co‐production workshops within an inclusive research project structure. Preliminary user testing of the Listen to Me PREM was conducted via semi‐structured interviews using the 'think aloud' method. Results: Co‐production included two people with intellectual disability, six people who support family members with intellectual disability, three researchers and three people with experience health service management or direct care. Preliminary user testing was completed by 11 people with intellectual disability with a range of communication needs and preferences. The resulting 9‐item Listen to Me PREMs are digitally‐enabled tools that include accessible features, such as large font and audible options to enable completion directly by people with a range of communication approaches. Conclusion: The Listen to Me PREMs provide an innovative tool to capture patent‐reported experiences directly from people with intellectual disability. By applying tools such as the Listen to Me PREMs, health services are better equipped to identify opportunities for improvement, to enhance access, quality and outcomes in health care delivery for consumers with high healthcare needs. Patient or Public Contribution: People with diverse abilities and communication preferences have been engaged both as members of the Listen to Me research team, and in all elements of data collection. The Listen to Me project has grown from a collaboration with consumers and all elements of this research engage with a diverse consumer group. The CanEngage Consumer Leadership Group (CLG) is central to all research activities including governance, data collection, analysis, preparation and dissemination of findings. The CLG has eight members, two members have intellectual disability and six are parents or siblings who support family members with intellectual disability to access health care. The CLG were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocols, the coproduction of the Patient reported experience measure (PREM) and as authors of this paper. People who support family members with intellectual disability to access healthcare were involved in constructing and editing the paper. Two people with intellectual disability were involved in reviewing the accessible summary of the paper and provided feedback on clarity. Some authors are family members of people living with an intellectual disability. These family members are crucial advocates for people with a severe intellectual disability who do not have the capacity or capability of communicating using speech or writing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N