Improving Delirium Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department (ED): The Implementation and Evaluation of the ED Delirium Detection Program.

Background: Delirium is missed in over 75% of older adults presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The study aimed to determine the efficacy of the ED Delirium Detection Program (ED‐DDP) to improve delirium detection while evaluating implementation outcomes. Methods: The ED‐DDP consisted of a t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Emergency Medicine Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 1 - 12
Autores principales: Sinvani, Liron, Perrin, Alexandra, Huebschmann, Amy G., Basile, Melissa, Groton, Stephanie, Barnaby, Doug, Sanchez, Gabriel, Chiuzan, Codruta, Chua, Vince, Slotnick, Stefani, Porreca, Kristen, Romano, Krisia, Kwiatek, Susan, Cary, Karen, Garg, Nidhi, Sud, Payal, Makhnevich, Alex
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191894082&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191894082
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10696563
        Z27
      jtl: Academic Emergency Medicine
      issn: 10696563
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 33
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191894082
        191894082
        191894082
        10.1111/acem.70235
        191894082
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Improving Delirium Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department (ED): The Implementation and Evaluation of the ED Delirium Detection Program.
      aug:
        au:
          Sinvani, Liron
          Perrin, Alexandra
          Huebschmann, Amy G.
          Basile, Melissa
          Groton, Stephanie
          Barnaby, Doug
          Sanchez, Gabriel
          Chiuzan, Codruta
          Chua, Vince
          Slotnick, Stefani
          Porreca, Kristen
          Romano, Krisia
          Kwiatek, Susan
          Cary, Karen
          Garg, Nidhi
          Sud, Payal
          Makhnevich, Alex
        affil: Northwell Health, New Hyde Park New York,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Emergency Service
          Delirium Diagnosis
          Health Screening
          Program Implementation
          Program Evaluation
          Quality Improvement
          Delirium Prevention and Control
          Human
          Funding Source
          New York
          Male
          Female
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Multimethod Studies
          Linear Regression
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
          Conceptual Framework
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Implementation Science
          Clinical Competence
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Delirium is missed in over 75% of older adults presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The study aimed to determine the efficacy of the ED Delirium Detection Program (ED‐DDP) to improve delirium detection while evaluating implementation outcomes. Methods: The ED‐DDP consisted of a train‐the‐trainer model where delirium champions (DCs) trained ED nurses to perform delirium screening using an electronic health record (EHR)‐embedded Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM). The ED‐DDP was implemented across 3 diverse EDs using a stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial, consisting of control, implementation, and intervention periods. The RE‐AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guided outcome assessments. Efficacy was defined as delirium detection between control and intervention periods. Implementation outcomes were assessed via quantitative (surveys, training logs, EHR) and qualitative (semi‐structured interviews) methods. Results: Across the 3 ED sites, 94.4% (n = 17/18) of DCs completed delirium training and 94.4% scored ≥ 80% on the post‐workshop assessment (Implementation/Fidelity). Over 90% (91.1%, n = 195/214) of nurses agreed to receive training by DCs (Adoption); the average score during nurse bCAM spot checks was 73.3% (Implementation‐Fidelity). After ED‐DDP implementation, the odds of delirium screening were 11.5 times higher (95% CI: [6.0, 22.3], p < 0.001), when adjusting for time and site clustering (Penetration); screening varied from 6% to 80% across the 3 sites (Reach). The proportion of older adult encounters with a positive delirium screen increased from 0% to 2.2% (p = 0.002; Efficacy). Qualitative data revealed that although DCs and nurses thought delirium screening was a priority for patient care quality and safety, competing priorities were a barrier to consistent and accurate screening (Maintenance). Conclusions: Although a comprehensive ED delirium training program successfully increased delirium screening, detection remained low. These findings suggest that sustainable delirium detection in the ED requires not only robust training but also deeply embedded workflow solutions and clear post‐detection action pathways.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N