The Emancipatory Potential of Aesthetic Experience: Rancière on Kant and Schiller.
This paper examines the emancipatory potential of aesthetic experience through a comparative reading of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Schiller, and Jacques Rancière. It argues that Rancière both inherits and transforms the Kantian-Schillerian legacy by shifting the question of freedom from free accord of...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 108; pp. 63 - 76 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=191901346&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 191901346 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 vid: 108 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 191901346 10.15388/Problemos.2025.108.5 ppf: 63 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 7.5MB tig: atl: The Emancipatory Potential of Aesthetic Experience: Rancière on Kant and Schiller. aug: au: Onol, Tugba Ayas affil: Sakarya University, Turkey su: Aesthetic experience Equality Schiller, Friedrich, 1759-1805 Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Liberty Critical theory Philosophers Rancière, Jacques, 1940- Political science sug: subj: Aesthetic experience Equality Schiller, Friedrich, 1759-1805 Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Liberty Critical theory Philosophers Rancière, Jacques, 1940- Political science keyword: aesthetic experience equality freedom Kant Rancière Schiller estetinis patyrimas Kantas laisvė lygybė Rancière'as Schilleris ab: This paper examines the emancipatory potential of aesthetic experience through a comparative reading of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Schiller, and Jacques Rancière. It argues that Rancière both inherits and transforms the Kantian-Schillerian legacy by shifting the question of freedom from free accord of faculties or moral autonomy to a meaning-disruptive experience of equality. While Kant and Schiller conceptualize the disinterested experience of the spectator in aesthetic or ethical terms, Rancière interprets it as a condition that can trigger a struggle for equality. The article traces this entangled genealogy to demonstrate how Rancière's notion of aesthetic experience cancels hierarchies and opens a space for dissensus, only within which politics can occur. By clarifying the conceptual transitions from Kant's sensus communis to Schiller's play drive and Rancière's dissensual common sense, the paper demonstrates how, for Rancière, aesthetics is a field of disagreement, revealing aesthetic experience as a political act that disrupts the pre-established sensible orders; and how it generates equality through discord, transforming aesthetic contemplation into a mode of emancipation from the dominant orders of meaning and sense. Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas estetinio patyrimo emancipacinis potencialas, tarpusavyje gretinant Immanuelio Kanto, Friedricho Schillerio bei Jacques'o Rancière'o tekstus. Tvirtinama, kad Rancière'as ne tik perima Kanto--Schillerio palikimą, bet ir jį transformuoja, perkeldamas laisvės klausimą nuo laisvo gebėjimų suderinimo ar moralinės autonomijos prie prasmę ardančio lygybės patyrimo. Kantas ir Schilleris nesuinteresuotą stebėtojo patyrimą apibrėžia estetiniais ar etiniais terminais, tačiau Rancière'as jį interpretuoja kaip sąlygą, galinčią sukelti kovą dėl lygybės. Straipsnyje bandoma atsekti visą šią painią genealogiją ir parodyti, kaip Rancière'o estetinio patyrimo suvokimas pašalina hierarchijas ir atveria erdvę disensusui. Disensusas yra vienintelė erdvė, kurioje gali „vykti“ politika. Išryškinus konceptualinius žingsnius nuo Kanto sensus communis prie Schillerio žaismo varos (Spieltrieb) bei Rancière'o disensinio sveiko proto, straipsnyje atskleidžiama, kaip, Rancière'o požiūriu, estetika pasirodo kaip nesutarimų sritis. Atskleidžiama, kad estetinis patyrimas yra politinis aktas, sutrikdantis nustatytas reikšmių sistemas. Taip pat parodoma, kaip estetinis patyrimas generuoja lygybę per nesutarimą, estetinę kontempliaciją transformuodamas į tokią būseną, kurioje pasiekiama emancipacija nuo įsigalėjusios prasmės ir reikšmės tvarkos. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|