Reasonable to Whom? Rethinking Informed Consent Disclosures in Light of the Research Related Concerns of the Autistic Community.

AbstractInformation disclosure during the informed consent process presents a dilemma. If too little information is presented, participants are unable to make an informed decision. Exhaustive disclosure is, however, a practical impossibility. In the United States, this dilemma was historically navig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Bioethics pp. 1 - 15
Autores principales: Khatiwada, Manisha, Howard, Dana, Krempley, Tema, Walton, Katherine, Williams, Crystal, Graber, Abraham David
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191969308&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191969308
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15265161
        FKZ
      jtl: American Journal of Bioethics
      issn: 15265161
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191969308
        10.1080/15265161.2026.2632012
        191969308
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reasonable to Whom? Rethinking Informed Consent Disclosures in Light of the Research Related Concerns of the Autistic Community.
      aug:
        au:
          Khatiwada, Manisha
          Howard, Dana
          Krempley, Tema
          Walton, Katherine
          Williams, Crystal
          Graber, Abraham David
        affil: The Ohio State University
      sug:
      ab: AbstractInformation disclosure during the informed consent process presents a dilemma. If too little information is presented, participants are unable to make an informed decision. Exhaustive disclosure is, however, a practical impossibility. In the United States, this dilemma was historically navigated in the research context by requiring that disclosure include enumerated items: the purpose of the research, potential risks, etc. In 2018, federal guidelines were updated to require that disclosure adhere to the reasonable person standard, whereby participants must be given all information that an “average” person would want to know. Drawing on the Autistic community’s unique concerns regarding research, we argue that, because of its emphasis on the informational wants of the “average” person, the reasonable person standard systematically fails to meet the informational needs of (many) people from minoritized populations. We argue for an individualized understanding of the reasonable person standard and provide recommendations for research teams.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N