Scientific progress in the mind of the theorist.

This paper investigates the writings of Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti (1930-2023) and Geoffrey Colin Harcourt (1931-2021) with the purpose of trying to understand how theorists conceptualise scientific progress and the impact this has on how they do their work. Most of the literature on the progress of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 241 - 258
Autores principales: Repapis, Constantinos, Fevereiro, José Bruno Ramos Torres
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Mar2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192347593&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192347593
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0309166X
        CEC
      jtl: Cambridge Journal of Economics
      issn: 0309166X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2026
      vid: 50
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192347593
        10.1093/cje/beaf061
      ppf: 241
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Scientific progress in the mind of the theorist.
      aug:
        au:
          Repapis, Constantinos
          Fevereiro, José Bruno Ramos Torres
        affil:
          National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
          National Bank for Economic and Social Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
      su:
        Kuhn, Thomas S., 1922-1996
        Theory of knowledge
        Philosophy of science
        Scientific development
        Theorists
      sug:
        subj:
          Theory of knowledge
          Philosophy of science
          Scientific development
          Theorists
          Kuhn, Thomas S., 1922-1996
      keyword:
        copyrightHolder:Cambridge Political Economy Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        Geoff Harcourt
        inLanguage:en
        Luigi Pasinetti
        methodology
        ontology
        post-Keynesian
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf061
        copyrightHolder:Cambridge Political Economy Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        Geoff Harcourt
        inLanguage:en
        Luigi Pasinetti
        methodology
        ontology
        post-Keynesian
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf061
      ab: This paper investigates the writings of Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti (1930-2023) and Geoffrey Colin Harcourt (1931-2021) with the purpose of trying to understand how theorists conceptualise scientific progress and the impact this has on how they do their work. Most of the literature on the progress of science focuses on the process that explains scientific progress in general, as a community phenomenon, and the methodological and ontological underpinnings of this process. In this paper, we focus on a different question: how does the perception of the progress of science influence the way a theorist does their work? We investigate the link between Pasinetti and Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions (Pasinetti, 1981, 2007) and contrast it with Harcourt's (1999) 'Horses for Courses' approach that, we contend has similarities with Larry Laudan's 'research traditions' conception. We argue that differences in the conception of the nature of the field and of progress in the discipline lead theorists to start from different ontological frameworks and, essentially, do theory building with different strengths and limitations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N