Clinical efficacy and safety of short-length peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) compared with long-length myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.

Background: Previous evidence suggests that a short myotomy does not reduce the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or increase intraoperative complications. However, the available studies are still limited and there has been no research in Latin America. Objectives: This study aims to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Vol. 19; pp. 1 - 13
Autores principales: Dávila-Ruales, Valentina, Vergara, Hernando J., Muñoz, Oscar M., Castañeda, Alexander, Vargas, Rómulo D., Rodríguez, Jesús A.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 3/16/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192372934&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 192372934
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        26317745
        M8AA
      jtl: Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      issn: 26317745
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 3/16/2026
      vid: 19
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192372934
        192372934
        192372934
        10.1177/26317745261433142
        192372934
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Clinical efficacy and safety of short-length peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) compared with long-length myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.
      aug:
        au:
          Dávila-Ruales, Valentina
          Vergara, Hernando J.
          Muñoz, Oscar M.
          Castañeda, Alexander
          Vargas, Rómulo D.
          Rodríguez, Jesús A.
        affil: Conceptualization, Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Kra 7 No. 40-62, Bogotá 110231, Colombia Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
      sug:
        subj:
          Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Methods
          Esophageal Achalasia Surgery
          Treatment Outcomes
          Patient Safety
          Referral and Consultation Colombia
          Human
          Colombia
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Retrospective Design
          Prospective Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          T-Tests
          Chi Square Test
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Data Analysis Software
          Scales
          Postoperative Complications
          Emphysema
          Abdomen
          Punctures
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Previous evidence suggests that a short myotomy does not reduce the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or increase intraoperative complications. However, the available studies are still limited and there has been no research in Latin America. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate whether POEM with a short myotomy differs significantly from a long myotomy in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with achalasia. Design/Methods: A retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent POEM for achalasia between 2017 and 2024. Efficacy was assessed according to the Eckardt scale at 6 months and at 1 year of follow-up. Safety was assessed for perioperative adverse events according to the iPOEM classification. Results: A total of 57 patients were included, 44% underwent short myotomy (median esophageal length of 5 cm; interquartile range (IQR) 4–5), and 56% long myotomy (median 11 cm IQR 10–13). 35% had previously undergone surgery for achalasia. The long myotomy group had more frequently minor complications such as emphysema (15.6% vs 0%; p = 0.039), capnoperitoneum (65.6% vs 16.0%, p < 0.001) and required more abdominal punctures (56.2% vs 12.0%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of other complications. The probability of symptomatic response, defined as an Eckardt score ⩽ 3 at 12 months, was similar between groups (84.3% vs 88%, p = 0.69). The median operative time for the short myotomy was shorter (median 80 min; IQR 70–95 vs 127.5 min; IQR 102–155 min; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Short myotomy is not inferior to long myotomy in terms of clinical success and long-term reflux disease in the management of patients with achalasia. Furthermore, it offers advantages such as shorter procedure times and potentially lower rates of minor complications, making it the preferred option in most cases.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N