Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems.

For more than forty years, giants in the field have argued that the study of policing can deepen our understanding of key concepts in the policy process literature. Despite this, there remains a noticeable gap in policy‐driven policing research. This article revisits that gap—not solely to integrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Policy Studies Journal Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Mewhirter, Jack, Wright, James E., Nicholson‐Crotty, Jill, Nicholson‐Crotty, Sean
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192436098&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192436098
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0190292X
        PSJ
      jtl: Policy Studies Journal
      issn: 0190292X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 54
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192436098
        10.1111/psj.70032
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 684KB
      tig:
        atl: Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems.
      aug:
        au:
          Mewhirter, Jack
          Wright, James E.
          Nicholson‐Crotty, Jill
          Nicholson‐Crotty, Sean
        affil:
          Baker School of Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Tennessee,, USA
          School of Public Affairs & School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona,, USA
          Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana,, USA
      su:
        Interdependence theory
        Policy analysis
        Law enforcement agencies
        Critical theory
        Policy diffusion
        Advocacy coalition framework
      sug:
        subj:
          Interdependence theory
          Policy analysis
          Law enforcement agencies
          Critical theory
          Policy diffusion
          Advocacy coalition framework
      keyword:
        policing
        theories of the policy process
        Teorías del proceso político
        Vigilancia
        政策过程理论
        警务
        policing
        theories of the policy process
        Teorías del proceso político
        Vigilancia
        政策过程理论
        警务
      ab: For more than forty years, giants in the field have argued that the study of policing can deepen our understanding of key concepts in the policy process literature. Despite this, there remains a noticeable gap in policy‐driven policing research. This article revisits that gap—not solely to integrate policing into policy process research, but to show how policing subsystems offer unique opportunities for researchers to test and refine core policy theories. To do so, we explore how several concepts central to contemporary theories of the policy process—issue networks, policy diffusion, interdependence, and critical theory—can be applied to policing. By comparing policing subsystems to more frequently studied domains (such as environmental arenas), we highlight how this research enables policy scholars to expand, refine, and/or challenge core concepts and themes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N