Contested Strategic Cultures: Anglosphere Participation in the Coalition against ISIS.
The study of multinational military interventions highlights the importance of four major factors to account for combat participation in US-led coalitions: threat perceptions, alliance considerations, domestic politics, and strategic culture. The latter, however, has been overlooked or uncorroborate...
| Publicado en: | International Studies Quarterly Vol. 67; no. 2; pp. 1 - 15 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jun2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192460598&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 192460598 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00208833 ISQ jtl: International Studies Quarterly issn: 00208833 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2023 vid: 67 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 192460598 10.1093/isq/sqad024 ppf: 1 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T db: hlh ui: 192460598 – @attributes: type: P db: hlh ui: 192460598 tig: atl: Contested Strategic Cultures: Anglosphere Participation in the Coalition against ISIS. aug: au: Massie, Justin Paquin, Jonathan Leclair, Kamille affil: Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada Université Laval, Canada University of Toronto, Canada su: Australia United Kingdom Canada Coalitions International relations National security English-speaking countries Military science Political debates sug: subj: Coalitions International relations National security Australia United Kingdom Canada Foreign affairs International Affairs National Security English-speaking countries Military science Political debates ab: The study of multinational military interventions highlights the importance of four major factors to account for combat participation in US-led coalitions: threat perceptions, alliance considerations, domestic politics, and strategic culture. The latter, however, has been overlooked or uncorroborated by major cross-national accounts of coalition warfare. Building on the fourth generation of scholars working on strategic culture as well as legislative studies scholarship, we propose and put to empirical test a conceptualization of strategic culture that focuses on force conceptions, foreign policy roles, and domestic contestation of self-representations. Through a longitudinal and systematic qualitative content analysis of parliamentary debates that took place in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia from August 2014 to December 2017, the article finds that force conception and domestic contestation are best associated with variation in allied participation in US-led combat operations. In contrast, foreign policy roles are not found to shed light on allied military participation. We conclude that more cross-national and within-case analyses of strategic culture hold the potential to contribute to our understanding of the peculiarities of coalition operations. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|