Effects of different working postures and pointing devices on energy expenditure, upper limb and back muscles activity, task performance and perception.

This study simultaneously compared four working postures (sitting on an office chair, on a ball, standing and pedalling on an ergocycle) and five pointing device configurations (traditional and slanted mouse placed next to and in front of the keyboard, and central pointing device) in relation to sed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ergonomics Vol. 69; no. 4; pp. 605 - 625
Autores principales: Gaudez, Clarisse, Desbrosses, Kévin, Clerc-Urmès, Isabelle
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192477715&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 192477715
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00140139
        ERO
      jtl: Ergonomics
      issn: 00140139
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 69
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192477715
        183368106
        192477715
        192477715
        10.1080/00140139.2025.2473022
        192477715
      ppf: 605
      ppct: 20
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Effects of different working postures and pointing devices on energy expenditure, upper limb and back muscles activity, task performance and perception.
      aug:
        au:
          Gaudez, Clarisse
          Desbrosses, Kévin
          Clerc-Urmès, Isabelle
        affil: Working Life Department, French National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France
      sug:
        subj:
          Posture
          Ergonomics Evaluation
          Mouse (Computer) Methods
          Energy Metabolism
          Upper Extremity
          Back
          Muscle, Skeletal Physiology
          Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation
          Employee Attitudes
          Human
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Male
          Female
          Experimental Studies
          Sitting
          Standing
          Oxygen Consumption
          Heart Rate
          Electromyography
          Muscle Fatigue
          Stress, Physiological Prevention and Control
          Trapezius Muscles Physiology
          Sedentary Behavior
          Musculoskeletal Diseases Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Self Assessment
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: This study simultaneously compared four working postures (sitting on an office chair, on a ball, standing and pedalling on an ergocycle) and five pointing device configurations (traditional and slanted mouse placed next to and in front of the keyboard, and central pointing device) in relation to sedentary behaviour and musculoskeletal disorders. Pedalling on an ergocycle was the only posture that exceeded the sedentary behaviour threshold of 1.5 METs. This posture resulted in the highest task completion time and was least favoured by participants. Regardless of the pointing device configuration, there was a risk of fatigue in the extensor carpi muscle of the dominant limb. Nevertheless, the central pointing device reduced stress on this muscle compared to mice. Task performance was the best with the traditional mouse. Using the central pointing device while pedalling on an ergocycle led to the lowest task performance and the highest stress on the trapezius muscle. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Compared to standing and sitting on a chair or a ball, using an ergocycle was the only posture reaching a sufficient energy expenditure with respect to sedentary behaviour. Traditional and slanted mice and central pointing device entail a risk of muscular fatigue. However, it was less with central pointing device.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N