Vascular-POPS: evidence for a new standard of care in the management of chronic limb-threatening Ischaemia.

Objective Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are often admitted emergently with significant comorbidity and frailty, and little time for pre-optimisation, resulting in longer hospital stays and worse outcomes. Our unit implemented a POPS (Perioperative Medicine for the Older Per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Age & Ageing Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Khan, Assad, Davies, Henry, Fawcett, Lee-Ellen, Darwood, Rosie, Anthony, Rebecca, Wallace, Tom
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192513129&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192513129
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00020729
        AGA
      jtl: Age & Ageing
      issn: 00020729
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2026
      vid: 55
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192513129
        10.1093/ageing/afag003
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Vascular-POPS: evidence for a new standard of care in the management of chronic limb-threatening Ischaemia.
      aug:
        au:
          Khan, Assad
          Davies, Henry
          Fawcett, Lee-Ellen
          Darwood, Rosie
          Anthony, Rebecca
          Wallace, Tom
        affil:
          Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UKFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
          Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
      su:
        Interprofessional relations
        Cost benefit analysis
        Stroke
        Ischemia treatment
        Peripheral vascular disease treatment
        Statistical power analysis
        Myocardial infarction
        Pneumonia
        Nursing care plans
        Ischemia
        Data analysis
        Peripheral vascular diseases
        Frail elderly
        Scientific observation
        Kruskal-Wallis Test
        Logistic regression analysis
        Major adverse cardiovascular events
        Patient readmissions
        Hospital mortality
        Descriptive statistics
        Chi-squared test
        Acute kidney failure
        Longitudinal method
        Surgical complications
        Odds ratio
        Geriatric assessment
        Statistics
        Nosocomial infections
        Delirium
        Length of stay in hospitals
        Confidence intervals
        Data analysis software
        Perioperative care
        Comorbidity
        Proportional hazards models
      sug:
        subj:
          Interprofessional relations
          Cost benefit analysis
          Stroke
          Ischemia treatment
          Peripheral vascular disease treatment
          Statistical power analysis
          Myocardial infarction
          Pneumonia
          Nursing care plans
          Ischemia
          Data analysis
          Peripheral vascular diseases
          Frail elderly
          Scientific observation
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Logistic regression analysis
          Major adverse cardiovascular events
          Patient readmissions
          Hospital mortality
          Descriptive statistics
          Chi-squared test
          Acute kidney failure
          Longitudinal method
          Surgical complications
          Odds ratio
          Geriatric assessment
          Statistics
          Nosocomial infections
          Delirium
          Length of stay in hospitals
          Confidence intervals
          Data analysis software
          Perioperative care
          Comorbidity
          Proportional hazards models
      keyword:
        adverse event
        chronic limb-threatening ischemia
        CLTI
        copyrightHolder:British Geriatrics Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        cost-effectiveness analysis
        frailty
        https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag003
        inLanguage:en
        length of stay
        older adult
        older people
        optimisation
        persistent organic pollutants
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        quality of care
        sameAs:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41609321/
        adverse event
        chronic limb-threatening ischemia
        CLTI
        copyrightHolder:British Geriatrics Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        cost-effectiveness analysis
        frailty
        https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag003
        inLanguage:en
        length of stay
        older adult
        older people
        optimisation
        persistent organic pollutants
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        quality of care
        sameAs:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41609321/
      ab: Objective Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are often admitted emergently with significant comorbidity and frailty, and little time for pre-optimisation, resulting in longer hospital stays and worse outcomes. Our unit implemented a POPS (Perioperative Medicine for the Older Person undergoing Surgery) service, incorporating the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to optimise patients. This study assesses its effect on non-elective CLTI inpatients. Methods This is a prospective observational cohort study at a single vascular centre, analysing outcomes in non-elective CLTI patients over three different periods: one year prior to POPS ('Pre-POPS'); during the initial delivery when it was nurse-led ('POPS v1'); and after it became physician-led ('POPS v2'). The primary outcome was length of stay (LoS), with 30-day and 12-month secondary outcomes. Cohorts were compared using propensity-score weighted statistical analysis. Economic analysis was undertaken. Results Six hundred and two patients were included. LoS reduced sequentially with greater POPS input (17 days vs. 13 days vs. 11 days, P  < .001). There was a significant reduction in 30-day acute kidney injury (33% vs. 37% vs. 8%, P  < .001), myocardial infarction (15% vs. 2% vs. 2% P  < .001) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (17% vs. 10% vs. 9%, P  = .048). Cox survival regression found a reduction in 12-month mortality of 37% for the POPS v1 [HR 0.628 (95% CI 0.481–0.891) P  = .013] and 40% for the POPS v2 [HR 0.598 (95% CI 0.431–0.913) P  = .001] cohorts, respectively. Economic analysis found that handling more medically complex patients with a shorter LoS negated its operational costs. Conclusion A Vascular-POPS collaborative service has resulted in major improvements in LoS, adverse events and survival in this most vulnerable of vascular patient cohorts and is a financially sustainable initiative.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N