Methodological approaches to estimate physical resilience in older adults: a comparison across two clinical settings.

Introduction Various methodological approaches exist to estimate physical resilience in older adults (phenotype, expected recovery, adapted ageing), but their comparative performance remains unclear. This study evaluated their agreement and predictive performance across two clinical contexts. Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Age & Ageing Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 1 - 8
Autores principales: Duin, Jan J, Smits, Rosalinde A L, Krans, Tim, Dekkers, Olaf M, Trompet, Stella, Groot, Bas de, Mooijaart, Simon P, van den Bos, Frederiek
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Feb2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192513153&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192513153
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00020729
        AGA
      jtl: Age & Ageing
      issn: 00020729
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 55
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192513153
        10.1093/ageing/afag025
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Methodological approaches to estimate physical resilience in older adults: a comparison across two clinical settings.
      aug:
        au:
          Duin, Jan J
          Smits, Rosalinde A L
          Krans, Tim
          Dekkers, Olaf M
          Trompet, Stella
          Groot, Bas de
          Mooijaart, Simon P
          van den Bos, Frederiek
        affil:
          Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, South Holland, The NetherlandsCenter for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, South Holland, The Netherlands
          Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, South Holland, The NetherlandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, South Holland, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
          Department of Emergency Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
      su:
        Netherlands
        Patients
        Emergency medical services
        Psychological adaptation
        Activities of daily living
        Old age
        Psychological resilience
        Predictive tests
        Secondary analysis
        Receiver operating characteristic curves
        Frail elderly
        Treatment effectiveness
        Cancer patients
        Descriptive statistics
        Hospital emergency services
        Functional status
        Longitudinal method
        Cancer chemotherapy
        Geriatric assessment
        Research
        Statistics
        Body movement
        Comparative studies
        Data analysis software
        Confidence intervals
        Tumors
      sug:
        subj:
          Patients
          Emergency medical services
          Psychological adaptation
          Activities of daily living
          Old age
          Netherlands
          Municipal police services
          Emergency and Other Relief Services
          Psychological resilience
          Predictive tests
          Secondary analysis
          Receiver operating characteristic curves
          Frail elderly
          Treatment effectiveness
          Cancer patients
          Descriptive statistics
          Hospital emergency services
          Functional status
          Longitudinal method
          Cancer chemotherapy
          Geriatric assessment
          Research
          Statistics
          Body movement
          Comparative studies
          Data analysis software
          Confidence intervals
          Tumors
      keyword:
        activities of daily living
        aging
        copyrightHolder:British Geriatrics Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        expected recovery
        follow-up
        geriatrics
        https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag025
        inLanguage:en
        instrumental activities of daily living
        older adult
        older people
        phenotype
        physical function
        physical resilience
        psychological
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        residual
        resilience
        sameAs:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41649295/
        stressor
        activities of daily living
        aging
        copyrightHolder:British Geriatrics Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        expected recovery
        follow-up
        geriatrics
        https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag025
        inLanguage:en
        instrumental activities of daily living
        older adult
        older people
        phenotype
        physical function
        physical resilience
        psychological
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        residual
        resilience
        sameAs:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41649295/
        stressor
      ab: Introduction Various methodological approaches exist to estimate physical resilience in older adults (phenotype, expected recovery, adapted ageing), but their comparative performance remains unclear. This study evaluated their agreement and predictive performance across two clinical contexts. Methods We applied three methodological approaches in two cohorts: older adults receiving chemotherapy (TENT) and those presenting with acute illness at the emergency department (APOP). Physical functioning was assessed using Katz Activities of Daily Living and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales. The phenotype approach measured functional change after the health stressor; the expected recovery approach compared actual to predicted recovery based on clinical characteristics; and the adapted ageing approach assessed baseline function relative to expected levels given clinical risk profile. Outcomes at 12 months included mortality and a composite endpoint of functional decline, quality of life decline or mortality. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa and predictive performance using area under the curve (AUC). Results The TENT cohort included 330 patients (median age 75 years; 43% female) and APOP included 2111 patients (median age 78 years; 54% female). Agreement between approaches was poor to moderate (κ = −0.10 to 0.64). All approaches showed only moderate discriminative ability for 12-month mortality (AUC 0.55–0.69) and composite outcomes (AUC 0.52–0.66). The physical resilience approaches provided limited added discrimination beyond simple predictors: functional score at follow-up (AUC 0.65–0.69) and age (AUC 0.48–0.67). Conclusion Various physical resilience approaches identified different patient groups as resilient and demonstrated limited prognostic value. Current approaches may inadequately capture the dynamic construct of physical resilience; higher-frequency longitudinal measures may better quantify physical resilience for clinical practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N