ANTIKINIO MĄSTYMO VISUMIŠKOJO SUBJEKTO DIFERENCIACIJA.
Early philosophising was holistic in nature, as was the subject matter - the soul. The Sophists began to differentiate this way of thinking by solving a different problem of the era. Recognising the challenges posed by Solon's legal reforms, they began to address the constraints on the initiative of...
| Publicado en: | Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) no. 126; pp. 6 - 21 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Logos
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=192674057&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 192674057 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 08687692 8XKW jtl: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) issn: 08687692 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2026 iid: 126 pid: 53094 pub: Logos artinfo: ui: 192674057 10.24101/logos.2026.01 ppf: 6 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 3.7MB tig: atl: ANTIKINIO MĄSTYMO VISUMIŠKOJO SUBJEKTO DIFERENCIACIJA. aug: au: JANKAUSKAS, SKIRMANTAS su: Soul Contextualism (Philosophy) Ancient philosophy Ancient philosophers Philosophers Theory of knowledge sug: subj: Soul Contextualism (Philosophy) Ancient philosophy Ancient philosophers Philosophers Theory of knowledge keyword: everyday thinking holistic thinking human measure private opinion the soul žmogaus matas kasdienis mąstymas privati nuomonė siela visumiškas mąstymas ab: Early philosophising was holistic in nature, as was the subject matter - the soul. The Sophists began to differentiate this way of thinking by solving a different problem of the era. Recognising the challenges posed by Solon's legal reforms, they began to address the constraints on the initiative of the free citizen of antiquity. To devalue the most significant obstacle - belief in the gods - the Sophists adopted the theoretical approach to fundamental entities outlined by Xenophanes and the Eleatic philosophers. Analysis of the surviving testimonies of Gorgias' work demonstrates that he primarily devalued generally conceivable entities, and therefore potentially the gods implied by them. Distancing himself from the devalued aspect of holistic thinking, Gorgias focused on the remaining aspect and, having analysed its cognitive specificity, developed a personal approach to sensual thinking. Protagoras completed the Sophists' differentiation of holistic thinking, defining the implicit subject of the aspect singled out by the Sophists. Protagoras' 'measure of man' was simply a definition of the subject of everyday thinking, which legitimised the importance of private opinion, i.e. 'δόξα'. Since everyday thinking serves unstoppable human experience, once realised, its subject became an irrevocable point of reference for revising ancient thinking. Ankstyvasis filosofavimas buvo visumiškos prigimties ir numanė tokios pat prigimties subjektą - sielą. Sofistai pradėjo šio mąstymo diferenciaciją spręsdami visai kitą laikmečio problemą. Įsisąmonindami Solono teisinių reformų keliamas reikmes, jie ėmėsi nureikšminti kliūtis, varžančias antikos laisvojo piliečio iniciatyvumą. Siekdami nureikšminti svarbiausią kliūtį - tikėjimą dievais, sofistai pasinaudojo Ksenofano bei Elėjos filosofų nužymėta teorine prieiga prie antikai pamatinių esybių. Analizuojant išlikusius Gorgijo kūrinio liudijimus, pademonstruojama, kad jis pirmiausia nureikšmino apskritai mąstomas esybės, taigi potencialiai ir jomis numanomus dievus. Atsiribodamas nuo nureikšminto visumiško mąstymo aspekto, Gorgijas susitelkė į likusį to mąstymo aspektą ir, išanalizavęs jo pažintinę specifiką, pagrindė neva jusliškojo mąstymo privatų būdą. Protagoras išbaigė sofistiškąją visumiškojo mąstymo diferenciaciją ir apibrėžė sofistų išskirto mąstymo aspekto numanomą subjektą. Protagoro suformuluotas žmogaus matas buvo ne kas kita, kaip kasdienio mąstymo subjekto apibrėžimas, kuris įteisino privačios nuomonės, t. y. δόξα, svarbą. Kadangi kasdienis mąstymas aptarnauja nė akimirkai nesustabdomą žmogiškąjį išgyvenimą, tai jo subjektas, jį įsąmoninus, tapo neatšaukiamu atskaitos tašku antikos mąstymui revizuoti. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) holder: Logos dt: @attributes: year: 2026 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|