Assessing Statistical Analysis Practices in Utilizing Data From the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015 to 2019 to Analyze Selected Health Outcomes of Sexual Minority Youth: A Systematic Review and Cross‐Sectional Analysis.

Introduction: This study critically evaluates the statistical methodologies employed in analyzing Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS) data from 2015 to 2019, specifically focusing on health outcomes for sexual minority youth (SMY). The YRBS is a crucial source of public health data, and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Adolescence Vol. 98; no. 3; pp. 957 - 965
Autores principales: Davoudpour, Shahin, Rivera, Adovich, Mason, Melanie E., Schechner, R. J., Kelsey, Scar Winter, Quiballo, Kay, Wall, Farley F., Radakovic, Predrag, Floresca, Ysabel Beatrice, Beach, Lauren Brittany, Phillips, Gregory Lee
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192727151&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192727151
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01401971
        JAA
      jtl: Journal of Adolescence
      issn: 01401971
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 98
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192727151
        10.1002/jad.70110
      ppf: 957
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Assessing Statistical Analysis Practices in Utilizing Data From the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015 to 2019 to Analyze Selected Health Outcomes of Sexual Minority Youth: A Systematic Review and Cross‐Sectional Analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Davoudpour, Shahin
          Rivera, Adovich
          Mason, Melanie E.
          Schechner, R. J.
          Kelsey, Scar Winter
          Quiballo, Kay
          Wall, Farley F.
          Radakovic, Predrag
          Floresca, Ysabel Beatrice
          Beach, Lauren Brittany
          Phillips, Gregory Lee
        affil:
          Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago Illinois,, USA
          Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago Illinois,, USA
      su:
        Medical statistics
        Public health surveillance
        LGBTQ+ youth
        Health status indicators
        Statistical weighting
        Sampling (Process)
        Statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Medical statistics
          Public health surveillance
          LGBTQ+ youth
          Health status indicators
          Statistical weighting
          Sampling (Process)
          Statistics
      keyword:
        sampling weights
        sexual minority youth
        statistical methodology
        substance use
        YRBS
        sampling weights
        sexual minority youth
        statistical methodology
        substance use
        YRBS
      ab: Introduction: This study critically evaluates the statistical methodologies employed in analyzing Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS) data from 2015 to 2019, specifically focusing on health outcomes for sexual minority youth (SMY). The YRBS is a crucial source of public health data, and robust analytical approaches are essential for generating reliable insights. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of existing literature utilizing YRBS data and performed empirical analyses to assess the impact of various statistical techniques. Our primary focus was on identifying discrepancies arising from the application, or lack thereof, of sampling weights, a critical component of YRBS methodology. We also examined the variability in statistical modeling approaches and software used across different studies. Results: Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between weighted and unweighted analyses, underscoring the imperative of adhering to established guidelines for incorporating sampling weights to ensure data validity. We observed instances where failing to account for survey design led to biased estimates of health disparities among SMY. Furthermore, we identified concerns regarding the inconsistent application of modeling approaches and statistical software, which introduces variability and potentially affects the robustness and comparability of results across studies. Conclusion: This research highlights the complexities inherent in public health data analysis, particularly with complex survey data like the YRBS. Adhering to appropriate statistical techniques and standardizing software applications are crucial for improving the validity and applicability of findings. Addressing these methodological challenges will ultimately support the development of more effective and targeted public health policies and interventions designed to improve the health and well‐being of SMY.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N