This is like a church – You come with an offering: Reflections on compensation during research data collection.
This reflective article centres on the controversy surrounding the practice of compensating research participants, drawing on insights gained from data collection experiences in rural, non-affluent schools in Kenya. The practice of going to the field 'empty-handed' is explored, shedding light on par...
| Published in: | Qualitative Research Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 487 - 499 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | research Journal Article |
| Published: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Apr2026
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192768363&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 192768363 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14687941 NLI jtl: Qualitative Research issn: 14687941 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2026 vid: 26 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 192768363 185180600 192768363 192768363 10.1177/14687941251341990 192768363 ppf: 487 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: This is like a church – You come with an offering: Reflections on compensation during research data collection. aug: au: Karisa, Amani Namatende-Sakwa, Lydia Ngware, Moses affil: Human Development Theme, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya sug: subj: Data Collection Research Ethics Research Subjects Schools Rural Areas Kenya Kenya Low and Middle Income Countries Human Interviews Faculty Attitudes Power Budgets ab: This reflective article centres on the controversy surrounding the practice of compensating research participants, drawing on insights gained from data collection experiences in rural, non-affluent schools in Kenya. The practice of going to the field 'empty-handed' is explored, shedding light on participants' reactions. To comprehend the foundational issues embedded in our field experiences, we employ perspectives from decolonial and post-colonial theories, examining three questions: What knowledge systems shape research practice with regard to compensation? What power structures guide the research agenda and influence compensation? And, what 'being' determines the 'acceptable' research practice with regard to compensation? We argue that the knowledge systems, power structures and conceptualizations of 'being' shaping research practices regarding compensation during data collection are often external to the research participants. This leads to the marginalization of the participants' voices concerning compensation. The practice of compensation during data collection can strengthen connections with participants and enhance research integrity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|