The differences in essential facial areas for impressions between humans and deep learning models: An eye‐tracking and explainable AI approach.

This study explored the facial impressions of attractiveness, dominance and sexual dimorphism using experimental and computational methods. In Study 1, we generated face images with manipulated morphological features using geometric morphometrics. In Study 2, we conducted eye tracking and impression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 117; no. 2; pp. 503 - 528
Autores principales: Sano, Takanori, Shi, Jun, Kawabata, Hideaki
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192785883&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192785883
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2026
      vid: 117
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192785883
        10.1111/bjop.12744
      ppf: 503
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 3.1MB
      tig:
        atl: The differences in essential facial areas for impressions between humans and deep learning models: An eye‐tracking and explainable AI approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Sano, Takanori
          Shi, Jun
          Kawabata, Hideaki
        affil:
          Graduate School of Human Relations, Keio University, Minato‐ku Tokyo,, Japan
          Faculty of Letters, Keio University, Minato‐ku Tokyo,, Japan
      su:
        Artificial intelligence
        Masculinity
        Femininity
        Social dominance
        Social attitudes
        Attention
        Personal beauty
        Analysis of variance
        Facial expression
        Facial anatomy
        Pearson correlation (Statistics)
        Research funding
        Eye movement measurements
        Descriptive statistics
        Deep learning
        Visual perception
        Data analysis software
        Sexual dimorphism
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial intelligence
          Masculinity
          Femininity
          Social dominance
          Social attitudes
          Attention
          Personal beauty
          Analysis of variance
          Facial expression
          Facial anatomy
          Pearson correlation (Statistics)
          Research funding
          Eye movement measurements
          Descriptive statistics
          Deep learning
          Visual perception
          Data analysis software
          Sexual dimorphism
      keyword:
        deep learning
        explainable AI
        eye‐tracking
        facial impressions
        geometric morphometrics
        deep learning
        explainable AI
        eye‐tracking
        facial impressions
        geometric morphometrics
      ab: This study explored the facial impressions of attractiveness, dominance and sexual dimorphism using experimental and computational methods. In Study 1, we generated face images with manipulated morphological features using geometric morphometrics. In Study 2, we conducted eye tracking and impression evaluation experiments using these images to examine how facial features influence impression evaluations and explored differences based on the sex of the face images and participants. In Study 3, we employed deep learning methods, specifically using gradient‐weighted class activation mapping (Grad‐CAM), an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) technique, to extract important features for each impression using the face images and impression evaluation results from Studies 1 and 2. The findings revealed that eye‐tracking and deep learning use different features as cues. In the eye‐tracking experiments, attention was focused on features such as the eyes, nose and mouth, whereas the deep learning analysis highlighted broader features, including eyebrows and superciliary arches. The computational approach using explainable AI suggests that the determinants of facial impressions can be extracted independently of visual attention.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N