Feminist Considerations in Research Recruitment for Pregnant Persons in Justice-Involved Contexts.
The article focuses on ethical and regulatory considerations in recruiting justice-involved pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for the Healthy Brain and Child Development Study (HBCD). It recommends applying the provisions of 45 CFR 46 Subpart C, which governs research involving pri...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 97 - 100 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Apr2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192847262&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 192847262 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15265161 FKZ jtl: American Journal of Bioethics issn: 15265161 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2026 vid: 26 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 192847262 10.1080/15265161.2026.2637064 192847262 ppf: 97 ppct: 3 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Feminist Considerations in Research Recruitment for Pregnant Persons in Justice-Involved Contexts. aug: au: Carpenter, Hannah McNamara, Victoria H. Yu, Xiang Campo-Engelstein, Lisa Smith, Elise M. affil: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston sug: subj: Narcotics Substance Use Disorders Criminal Justice Prisoners Research Subject Recruitment Legislation and Jurisprudence Pregnancy Female Ethics, Medical Government Regulations Feminism Human Rights Female ab: The article focuses on ethical and regulatory considerations in recruiting justice-involved pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for the Healthy Brain and Child Development Study (HBCD). It recommends applying the provisions of 45 CFR 46 Subpart C, which governs research involving prisoners, due to the overlap between OUD and justice involvement, to preempt regulatory complications if participants become incarcerated during the study. Using a feminist ethics framework, the article advises including data on biological fathers, ensuring Institutional Review Board (IRB) representation with relevant lived experience, minimizing legal risks heightened by recent changes in reproductive rights law, and addressing historical exclusion of pregnant and incarcerated populations from research to promote equitable inclusion and protect participant autonomy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|