Explaining Subnational Variations in India's Pandemic Response: State Capacity, Covid-Contingency, or Partisan Federalism?

This study examines the role of state capacity, COVID-19 contingency, and partisan federalism in explaining variation in COVID-19 mortality and under-reporting across Indian states. A multiple linear regression reveals that better health infrastructure and welfare regimes reduce excess deaths and un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Publius: The Journal of Federalism Vol. 56; no. 2; pp. 504 - 539
Autores principales: Sharma, Chanchal Kumar, Swenden, Wilfried
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Spring2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192964325&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192964325
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00485950
        UBL
      jtl: Publius: The Journal of Federalism
      issn: 00485950
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2026
      vid: 56
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192964325
        10.1093/publius/pjaf049
      ppf: 504
      ppct: 35
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Explaining Subnational Variations in India's Pandemic Response: State Capacity, Covid-Contingency, or Partisan Federalism?
      aug:
        au:
          Sharma, Chanchal Kumar
          Swenden, Wilfried
        affil:
          Department of Political Science, Central University of Haryana, Mahendragarh 123001, IndiaInstitute of Asian Studies, German Institute for Global and Area Studies, Hamburg 20354, Germany
          Department of Political Science, School of Social and Political Science (SSPS), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH89LD, UK
      su:
        India
        Public welfare
        Federal government
        Pandemic preparedness
        COVID-19 pandemic
        Partisanship
        Public sector
        Public health infrastructure
      sug:
        subj:
          Public welfare
          Federal government
          Pandemic preparedness
          COVID-19 pandemic
          Partisanship
          Public sector
          India
          Health and Welfare Funds
          Administration of Human Resource Programs (except Education, Public Health, and Veterans' Affairs Programs)
          Other Individual and Family Services
          Emergency and Other Relief Services
          Public health infrastructure
      keyword:
        copyrightHolder:CSF Associates Inc.
        copyrightYear:2026
        COVID-19
        crisis governance
        inLanguage:en
        partisan federalism
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf049
        state capacity
        copyrightHolder:CSF Associates Inc.
        copyrightYear:2026
        COVID-19
        crisis governance
        inLanguage:en
        partisan federalism
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf049
        state capacity
      ab: This study examines the role of state capacity, COVID-19 contingency, and partisan federalism in explaining variation in COVID-19 mortality and under-reporting across Indian states. A multiple linear regression reveals that better health infrastructure and welfare regimes reduce excess deaths and under-reporting. Human development, however, is paradoxically linked to higher mortality—likely due to older populations and greater mobility—though it correlates with greater reporting accuracy. However, affiliation with the center is positively associated with both excess deaths and under-reporting, contradicting expectations of improved coordination. Our qualitative analysis suggests that affiliated states were more likely to operate under tacit or imposed cooperation vis-à-vis the center and to adopt power-concentrating governance that constrained local responsiveness. In contrast, nonaffiliated states—less bound by centralized party incentives—tended to pursue power-sharing modes at the state level that enabled local responsiveness. Our findings underscore the importance of investing in health infrastructure, social welfare, and institutionalized shared-rule mechanisms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N