Federal Responses to Three Twenty-First Century Crises: More Continuity than Centralization in American Federalism.
Analysis of the 2001 terrorist attacks, the 2007–2009 financial crisis, and the 2020–2022 COVID-19 crisis found more continuity than discontinuity in American federalism as the federal government mostly employed existing intergovernmental channels and grant programs to address the crises in mostly b...
| Publicado en: | Publius: The Journal of Federalism Vol. 56; no. 2; pp. 353 - 388 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Spring2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192964327&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 192964327 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00485950 UBL jtl: Publius: The Journal of Federalism issn: 00485950 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2026 vid: 56 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 192964327 10.1093/publius/pjaf065 ppf: 353 ppct: 35 formats: tig: atl: Federal Responses to Three Twenty-First Century Crises: More Continuity than Centralization in American Federalism. aug: au: Kincaid, John affil: Meyner Center, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042-1760, USA su: United States. Congress Federal government September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001 COVID-19 pandemic Crisis management Intergovernmentalism Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 sug: subj: Federal government September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001 COVID-19 pandemic United States. Congress Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities Legislative Bodies Crisis management Intergovernmentalism Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 keyword: 9/11 centralization copyrightHolder:CSF Associates Inc. copyrightYear:2026 COVID-19 crises federalism financial crisis great recession inLanguage:en intergovernmental relations publisher:Oxford University Press sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf065 terrorism 9/11 centralization copyrightHolder:CSF Associates Inc. copyrightYear:2026 COVID-19 crises federalism financial crisis great recession inLanguage:en intergovernmental relations publisher:Oxford University Press sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf065 terrorism ab: Analysis of the 2001 terrorist attacks, the 2007–2009 financial crisis, and the 2020–2022 COVID-19 crisis found more continuity than discontinuity in American federalism as the federal government mostly employed existing intergovernmental channels and grant programs to address the crises in mostly bipartisan ways. Centralizing responses depend on a number of factors: whether (1) the federal government is unified by a centralizing party, (2) divided government compels compromises, (3) public perceptions of crisis mismanagement lead voters to elect a new centralizing president and Congress, (4) needs for quick responses lead Congress to employ extant intergovernmental tools, (5) the crisis can be blamed on state and local government failures or incapacities, (6) state and local governments are fiscally vulnerable, (7) state and local governments are the leading responders, (8) the federal government is dependent on state and local governments for policy implementation, and (9) the Supreme Court supports or opposes centralizing measures. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|