Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.

Accurate assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential for informing clinical decision-making and guiding health policy. Item Response Theory (IRT) enhances measurement by providing detailed evidence on item discrimination, difficulty, fairness, and precision, consistent with COSMIN gu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Inquiry (00469580) Vol. 63; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors: Ntumi, Simon, Sakyi, Lawrence Larbi, Bulala, Tapela, Agbovor, Divine, Amfo, Gabriel Odame, Gabla, John, Anakwa, Rudi, Amezah, Emmanuel Ohene
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications Inc. 4/13/2026
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192982126&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 192982126
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00469580
        INQ
      jtl: Inquiry (00469580)
      issn: 00469580
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 4/13/2026
      vid: 63
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192982126
        192982126
        192982126
        10.1177/00469580261441163
        192982126
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.
      aug:
        au:
          Ntumi, Simon
          Sakyi, Lawrence Larbi
          Bulala, Tapela
          Agbovor, Divine
          Amfo, Gabriel Odame
          Gabla, John
          Anakwa, Rudi
          Amezah, Emmanuel Ohene
        affil: University of Education, Winneba (UEW), West Africa, Ghana
      sug:
        subj:
          Patient-Reported Outcomes
          Models, Statistical
          Healthcare Disparities
          Reliability Evaluation
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Clinical Indicators
          Health Policy
          Outcomes (Health Care)
          Ghana
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Item Analysis
          Quantitative Studies
          Ambulatory Care Facilities
          Health Status
          Psychometrics
          Quality of Life
          Reproducibility of Results
          Decision Making, Clinical
          Stratified Random Sample
          Psychometrics Evaluation
          Coefficient alpha
          Correlational Studies
          Factor Analysis
          Internal Consistency
          Patient Compliance
          Self Report
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Data Analysis Software
          Chi Square Test
          Purposive Sample
          Questionnaires
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Accurate assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential for informing clinical decision-making and guiding health policy. Item Response Theory (IRT) enhances measurement by providing detailed evidence on item discrimination, difficulty, fairness, and precision, consistent with COSMIN guidelines. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed, involving 500 adult patients attending outpatient facilities across public, private, and community-based healthcare centers in southern Ghana. Stratified random sampling was used to ensure representativeness across settings. Psychometric evaluation combined CTT analyzes Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations, and factor analysis with IRT modeling, specifically the graded response model (GRM). CTT analyses indicated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.84), while IRT modeling (graded response model) showed higher reliability (marginal reliability = 0.91) and revealed patterns of precision across the health spectrum. IRT-based scores were meaningfully associated with treatment adherence (β =.45), quality of life (β =.41), and self-reported health status (β =.38), illustrating predictive validity. Differential item functioning analyses indicated limited subgroup bias. Integrating CTT and IRT strengthens the rigor, precision, and fairness of PRO measurement. IRT-calibrated instruments demonstrate practical value for clinical monitoring and health system evaluation and are recommended for routine implementation in diverse healthcare settings.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N