Trialling the Distress Thermometer tool on non-oncology general medical and surgical inpatients.

Background: Risk assessment tools are intended to support nurses' decision-making in the continuous Nursing Process of comprehensive assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation for each patient in their care. While patient distress is common during periods of ill-health, tools to formally as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 18 - 30
Autores principales: Jedwab, Rebecca M., Baker, Jessica G., Gogler, Janette, Pham, Anthony T., Redley, Bernice, White, Karin, Dobroff, Naomi K.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193038437&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193038437
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10376178
        G9U
      jtl: Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession
      issn: 10376178
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 62
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193038437
        185183089
        193038437
        193038437
        10.1080/10376178.2025.2503311
        193038437
      ppf: 18
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Trialling the Distress Thermometer tool on non-oncology general medical and surgical inpatients.
      aug:
        au:
          Jedwab, Rebecca M.
          Baker, Jessica G.
          Gogler, Janette
          Pham, Anthony T.
          Redley, Bernice
          White, Karin
          Dobroff, Naomi K.
        affil: Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, EMR & Informatics Program, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychological Distress Evaluation
          Digital Technology
          Implementation Science
          Nursing Staff, Hospital Psychosocial Factors
          Surgical Patients
          Inpatients
          Risk Assessment
          Electronic Health Records
          Feedback
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Qualitative Studies
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Usability Study
          Content Analysis
          Nurse Managers
          Nurse Attitudes
          Audit
          Workload
          Patient Assessment
          Hand Off (Patient Safety)
          Scales
          Chi Square Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Risk assessment tools are intended to support nurses' decision-making in the continuous Nursing Process of comprehensive assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation for each patient in their care. While patient distress is common during periods of ill-health, tools to formally assess distress are not routinely used by nurses. Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of the distress thermometer by nurses for general medical and surgical inpatients. Methods: An audit of 2370 electronic medical records was used to extract data on risk assessment completion for adult patients admitted across three wards from December 2020 to March 2021. An online survey using the System Usability Scale and free-text comments collected data on nurses' perceptions of the Distress Thermometer. Results: Only 33% of patients had the Distress Thermometer tool completed by nurses during patient risk assessment on their admission to the hospital ward (393/2370). Only 12.86% of nurses reported scores indicating acceptable usability of the Distress Thermometer in electronic medical records (greater than 68). Distress Thermometer completion was significant between wards (chi-square analysis X2 (2, N = 2,370) = 84.902, p = <.001). Factors contributing to low usability included unnecessary addition to their workload and tool perceived as not useful to care planning. Discussion: Nurses reported the Distress Thermometer was an unnecessary addition to their workload and not perceived to add any value to patient assessment in general medical and surgical inpatients. Conclusion: Nursing risk assessments in electronic medical records carry a high workload burden. The perceived usability, usefulness and suitability for specific patient groups are important considerations for uptake and implementation of any additional tools.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N