Increasing rate of pre-operative stoma site marking in patients with intestinal ostomy (INSTOSI): a best practice implementation project.

Introduction: Pre-operative stoma site marking is a strongly recommended practice for preventing complications and improving the health-related quality of life of intestinal stoma patients. Despite its benefits, this practice is not routinely implemented in clinical practice. Objectives: This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JBI Evidence Implementation Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 287 - 296
Autores principales: Shehu, Eni, Pieper, Dawid, Albrecht, Hendrik C., Gretschel, Stephan, Krüger, Colin M., Leggio, Francesco, Mantke, René, Rückbeil, Oskar, Paasch, Christoph, Trawa, Mateusz, Klugarová, Jitka, Peričić, Tina Poklepović, Bała, Małgorzata M., Prill, Robert, Kugler, Charlotte M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Apr2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193096427&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193096427
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        26913321
        MO0F
      jtl: JBI Evidence Implementation
      issn: 26913321
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 24
      iid: 2
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193096427
        193096427
        193096427
        10.1097/XEB.0000000000000503
        193096427
      ppf: 287
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Increasing rate of pre-operative stoma site marking in patients with intestinal ostomy (INSTOSI): a best practice implementation project.
      aug:
        au:
          Shehu, Eni
          Pieper, Dawid
          Albrecht, Hendrik C.
          Gretschel, Stephan
          Krüger, Colin M.
          Leggio, Francesco
          Mantke, René
          Rückbeil, Oskar
          Paasch, Christoph
          Trawa, Mateusz
          Klugarová, Jitka
          Peričić, Tina Poklepović
          Bała, Małgorzata M.
          Prill, Robert
          Kugler, Charlotte M.
        affil: Institute for Health Services and Health Systems Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Preoperative Period
          Enterostomy
          Surgical Site Verification
          Surgical Patients
          Implementation Science
          Human
          Funding Source
          Germany
          Schools, Medical
          Audit
          Feedback
          Surgery, Elective
          Emergency Patients
          Time
          Memory
          Communication
          Surgeons
          Nurses
          Checklists
          Ostomy Care
      ab: Introduction: Pre-operative stoma site marking is a strongly recommended practice for preventing complications and improving the health-related quality of life of intestinal stoma patients. Despite its benefits, this practice is not routinely implemented in clinical practice. Objectives: This study aimed to increase the rate of pre-operative stoma site marking. Methods: This evidence implementation project was conducted in three hospitals at the Brandenburg Medical School, Germany. The project followed the seven-stage JBI audit and feedback process recommended in the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework: (1) identification of practice area for change, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) situational analysis of context, (4) baseline audit of stoma site marking rate, (5) strategy implementation (workshops with surgeons in each hospital to discuss baseline results), (6) 1-year follow-up audit, and (7) assessing the sustainability of practice changes. Results: The baseline audit revealed the following marking rates: 163 of 305 cases (53%) were marked across the three hospitals between 2017 and 2022. Elective cases were more often marked (145 of 200, 73%) than emergency cases (18 of 105, 17%). Barriers included poor physical state of emergency patients, lack of time, memory recall, and communication issues between surgeons and nurses. At follow-up 1 year after the workshops, 86 of 173 cases (50%) were marked (elective cases: 57 of 80, 71%; emergency cases: 29 of 93, 31%). Conclusions: Audit and feedback did not increase the overall rate of pre-operative stoma site marking, but did improve the rate in emergency cases. A single workshop may be insufficient to effect change. Electronic patient data lacked standardized documentation for pre-operative stoma site marking. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A329
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N