User evaluation of an implementation toolkit for maternal–newborn care settings.
Introduction and aims: Applying knowledge generated from implementation science can improve the process teams use to move evidence into practice. To facilitate the use of implementation science knowledge in practice, training and resources for health care providers and leaders are needed. Our team d...
| Publicado en: | JBI Evidence Implementation Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 414 - 431 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Apr2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193096438&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 193096438 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 26913321 MO0F jtl: JBI Evidence Implementation issn: 26913321 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2026 vid: 24 iid: 2 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 193096438 193096438 193096438 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000541 193096438 ppf: 414 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: User evaluation of an implementation toolkit for maternal–newborn care settings. aug: au: Reszel, Jessica Lavin Venegas, Carolina Dunn, Sandra I. Cassidy, Christine E. Brownlee, Janet Cloutier, Mireille Daub, Olivia Hafizi, Kaamel Lightfoot, Marnie Pervez, Dahlia Quosdorf, Ashley Wood, Allison Graham, Ian D. affil: School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada sug: subj: Health Personnel Education Maternal Health Services Education Maternal-Child Care Education Program Implementation Program Evaluation Implementation Science Human Female Multimethod Studies Cross Sectional Studies Surveys Qualitative Studies Interviews Questionnaires Thematic Analysis Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Clinical Assessment Tools Female ab: Introduction and aims: Applying knowledge generated from implementation science can improve the process teams use to move evidence into practice. To facilitate the use of implementation science knowledge in practice, training and resources for health care providers and leaders are needed. Our team developed a toolkit for maternal–newborn settings to provide guidance and tools on how to apply implementation science knowledge to their practice change initiatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toolkit for acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, usability, and potential adoption. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study. Health care providers and leaders working in Ontario maternal–newborn care read the toolkit and completed a feedback survey and interview. The questionnaire included questions on toolkit content and format and validated measures on acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and usability. The interviews explored questionnaire responses and application of the toolkit. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Results: Participants (n = 17) rated the toolkit as acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and usable, indicating the toolkit met the need for practical resources to guide implementation. Most participants indicated their intention to use the toolkit and refer it to others. Several areas for improvement were identified, including simplifying language and content and improving the format. Participants highlighted the need to effectively disseminate the toolkit and offer training and support for its successful implementation. Conclusions: The toolkit has the potential to improve maternal–newborn teams' implementation processes and outcomes. Future work is needed to improve the toolkit and evaluate its use and impact in practice. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A431 pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|